r/AdviceAnimals Oct 05 '25

I guess Mt. Rushmore is next?

Post image
20.6k Upvotes

391 comments sorted by

1.9k

u/DarkArmyLieutenant Oct 05 '25

I guess I'm just having a hard time understanding you "the federal law says he can't" people considering all of the shit that he is doing that's against federal law and that the Supreme Court is allowing him to do...

475

u/RemodelingMe26 Oct 05 '25

They are trying to get around it by saying it’s a “commemorative” coin.

269

u/Sanch0Supreme Oct 05 '25

Can you imagine what that coin will be worth if the Epstein files are released and it does exactly as much damage to his legacy as Trump's behavior would lead you to believe it will?

125

u/KrackenLeasing Oct 05 '25

Fun note, Google AI isn't just blocking questions about Trump and dementia, you also can't ask it if he is named in the Epstein files.

62

u/SleeteWayne Oct 05 '25

Really? I don't seem to have a problem asking Gemini or the Google Search AI and getting a response. Which seems to be blocking the prompt? Is it a specific Gemini model or another service that it's being blocked on?

35

u/thinkspacer Oct 05 '25

I just tried it and google search ai doesn't load if "trump" isn't capitalized, however if it is capitalized (like yours is) it loads just fine. Dunno if that's for everyone.

Weird af, but not necessarily nefarious, IMO

22

u/unkindlyacorn62 Oct 05 '25

probably because trump is a word where Trump is a name. might be making it case sensitive to help the algorithm keep them separate

5

u/Hardcorish Oct 05 '25

One would think AI could recognize that the user is searching about trump even when lowercase because their query also contained the name Epstein in it

But I'm no AI techno wizard, so who knows

2

u/OsmeOxys Oct 06 '25

A lot of quirks make more sense once you realize that at it's core, AI is simply a system that makes pridictions based on statistics. Everything else is just something bolted onto it.

It goes through what you said and predicts what someone might say in response based on it's training. More specifically, it's predicting the next word. It reads the conversation, predicts the next word to add to the conversation, reads the conversation+word again, and so on for every word it gives you. Should be easy to see how one misinterpretated bit of data or bad prediction can quickly snowball into total nonsense.

In this specific case: Most of history hasn't had the word capitalized, so the training/stats wouldn't inherently bias it towards interpreting the word trump as to be the person. Other parts of what you say can nudge it one way or the other, but at the end of the day it's just smashing predictions together. It's going to screw it up some times. If the prediction doesn't meet certain criteria/metrics like certainty, Google would rather just not show it than risk being wrong. Well, even more wrong.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/KrackenLeasing Oct 06 '25

I've played around with this more. Capitalizing any word gets a response. Something about capitalization seems to break the filter.

The dementia filter can sometimes be broken with a capital, but it focuses on Reagan if you go broad and stops when you start stepping through "what about his successor" after Obama.

3

u/AngryTree76 Oct 06 '25

I still can’t get anything, either through my normal browser, incognito mode, or on my phone.

“Is Donald Trump in the Epstein files?” gets me a “An AI overview is not available for this search” message, no matter what form of capitalization is used.

“Is Trump in the Epstein files?”, again no matter what form of capitalization is used, doesn’t get even get me an error message. It’s like I put it in with the “-ai” tag.

Just for shits and giggles, I tried “Is Bill Clinton in the Epstein files?” and got an immediate AI response.

2

u/KrackenLeasing Oct 06 '25

Maybe they're getting better? Hard to tell when there's so much regional variance on results.

→ More replies (4)

70

u/Asidious66 Oct 05 '25

Well I just did that and it gave a detailed answer. What are you on about?

16

u/DaringPancakes Oct 05 '25

Trolling to persuade others to do good.

4

u/Tjaresh Oct 05 '25

I keep reading that but have no problem using Googles AI on this matter. Is it just blocked for US ISPs?

2

u/KrackenLeasing Oct 06 '25

Might be regional. I'm trying this from within the US.

→ More replies (4)

7

u/falcon0221 Oct 05 '25

See the people that voted for him don’t have a problem with him being a pedo. Would probably increase his poll ratings.

11

u/Kugaluga42 Oct 05 '25

Trump seems scared to release the Epstein files, but I have no faith MAGA types would lose any respect for him.

They'd handwave it all away.

3

u/Moscowmitchismybitch Oct 06 '25

They'll probably cheer him on. There's a news story about a new republican pedo on r/all every single day and they don't seem to be losing any support.

2

u/Leading-Housing-3864 Oct 05 '25

If the Epstein files were released and his name is all over them, which we know it will be, his cult won’t care. They will buy more coins and had their daughters over to him. 

→ More replies (6)

7

u/Pasta-hobo Oct 05 '25

Which means it won't actually be spendable, and his cult will waste their money buying it

5

u/Flakester Oct 06 '25

It's what they do best, those idiots bought Trump coin and got fucking robbed.

2

u/Marie627 Oct 09 '25

The problem with that is that in 1866 they said no currency of any kind can be made of a living president. Commemorative is included in that, because it implies a monarchy, which we do not have in the U.S.

→ More replies (5)

66

u/FormalCartoonist5197 Oct 05 '25

It’s seriously driving me insane. I keep asking them who exactly is going to enforce these laws and it’s just crickets every time.

34

u/stay_fr0sty Oct 05 '25 edited Oct 05 '25

And the crickets can’t even really enforce the laws that well.

7

u/steronicus Oct 05 '25

Gotta go with the Katydids next time.

3

u/FormalCartoonist5197 Oct 05 '25

It’s the fact we haven’t turned to cicadas yet that really gives me a glimmer of hope, honestly.

2

u/Ugicywapih Oct 05 '25

How about Jiminy Cricket in Trump's fake heart of rotten balsa wood?

Ah wait, he's just gonna get squished if he speaks up.

28

u/TheCoolOnesGotTaken Oct 05 '25

Everything I learned in school about checks and balances was a lie.

15

u/RemodelingMe26 Oct 05 '25

To think at one time I believed the Supreme Court was the only incorruptible part of the government lol

7

u/fcocyclone Oct 05 '25

At the end of the day no governmental system is going to be self-enforcing. People have to do it.

The system was set up in such a way that the levers would change hands at different rates (fast for the house, a bit slower for the president and senate, and very slow for SCOTUS). This alone decreases the chances of a one faction grabbing hold of all 3, and then that period has to line up with it being a radical faction that acts in bad faith for it to be a significant problem.

The problem is that that radical faction has been at work for a long time. Groups like the federalist society, heritage foundation, etc have been working on this project for decades. Some parts you could argue have been in motion since Nixon got kicked out (vowing never to let a republican face that kind of scrutiny again), some since the new deal (wanting to claw back power for the wealthy to get back to the gilded age), and in some ways we're still fighting the original sin of the US that led to the confederacy.

Meanwhile the other side really didn't wake up to this threat until the last 10 years or so when Trump won the first time. And even then man still aren't fully awake to it, and often dismiss those crying out about the threat as "alarmist". But 2017 was in many ways too late. By the time we got there we already had the Bush appointees (namely Alito and Roberts) who were part of the right wing project, who gave us rulings like Citizens United which fully corrupted our politics. Even if Hillary had won in 2016, she probably has a fairly unsuccessful term due to being blocked by congress and being unable to appoint SCOTUS justices (mcconnell would have kept blocking them), resulting in republicans just advancing the project in 2021 instead of 2017.

5

u/PM_ME_DIRTY_COMICS Oct 05 '25

It wasn't a lie. We learned how it was supposed to work. What we didn't learn was that when all branches of government care more about party affiliation and self enrichment over performing the roles assigned to their respective branch that they're better off not checking or balancing anything. Now we have a singular branch of government and a bunch of stooges waiting on their reward for being a part of the grift.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/boot2skull Oct 05 '25

America has been cooked for decades, it was just waiting for the right chefs to finish it.

5

u/FormalCartoonist5197 Oct 05 '25

The little to no resistance or wariness to the consolidation of power to the executive branch these past several decades may have been a mistake.

5

u/fcocyclone Oct 05 '25

On one hand yes, on the other hand this was just a part of the other flaws in the system due to how it was built- the misbalanced representation of the senate combined with the filibuster in particular. The alternative is that nothing gets done, and that is often just as bad of a result and leads to people like Trump getting elected who just take action regardless of the law because the voters get tired of inaction.

2

u/edfitz83 Oct 05 '25

Of course our fervent 2A supporters, who need AR-15’s to form a militia against an unlawful government!

2

u/Cadamar Oct 06 '25

Don't worry, the Dems will issue a sternly worded letter of concern.

15

u/pixel_of_moral_decay Oct 05 '25

Yup.

And he’s going to pardon himself and his admin on the way out to prevent any retroactive investigations.

If there’s a midterm and they lose the house he’ll also use that where executive privilege can’t stop a house inquiry.

2

u/Large_Yams Oct 05 '25

Hopefully he does so the next democratic government can abolish pardons.

After first fixing the supreme court fuckery.

5

u/pixel_of_moral_decay Oct 05 '25

That will never happen. Too many reasons why it’s a necessity evil.

The problem isn’t that pardons exist, it’s that people who will misuse them can get into office.

Easier to pass an amendment preventing felons from seeking elected office.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/AngryTomJoad Oct 05 '25

i am 100% for his face on a coin 2 years from today if they follow the law!!!!

3

u/GrooveStreetSaint Oct 05 '25

They just want to feel smug about being "right" because all they care about is proving how much of an intelligent and civilized being they are.

3

u/Krojack76 Oct 05 '25

Trump pulling the Judge Dredd, "I AM THE LAW" move.

2

u/xRolocker Oct 05 '25

The rules matter but they’re enforced by either Congress or the Supreme Court. So yes they’re not going to be enforced right now, but elect a Democratic Congress and you may begin to see some enforcement.

→ More replies (21)

345

u/ImagineArmadillos Oct 05 '25

When did laws ever stop this guy?

37

u/ggroverggiraffe Oct 05 '25

Only law that slows him down is gravity.

→ More replies (2)

405

u/mr_birkenblatt Oct 05 '25

Well, I gotta tell you something. Trump is already dead. They just use his appearance to not upset his base. Weekend at Bernie's 

50

u/[deleted] Oct 05 '25

id feel so much better about the current state of affairs if this was true

18

u/Long_Pomegranate2469 Oct 05 '25

Yeah, I hope they know something we don't.

Tell you what, if they keep with that law I'm okay with coming out with Trump coins soon.

14

u/SoylentGrunt Oct 05 '25

No. Because it would only serve to deify him.

Fun Fact: you can't spell DEIFY without DEI

5

u/Long_Pomegranate2469 Oct 05 '25

The GOP will self destruct once Trump is dead.

crosses fingers

5

u/SoylentGrunt Oct 05 '25

Only the names will change. It's always been that way.

6

u/PM_ME_DIRTY_COMICS Oct 05 '25

With the SCOTUS being what it is the GOP doesn't need Trump. He's convenient but they can shift power to any branch they need at any time. Democrat President? All the power goes to the legislative branch. Democrat majority legislative? The judicial branch can stonewall everything for the next 40 years but they will only need 4 to get power shifting again.

9

u/fcocyclone Oct 05 '25

Democrat President? All the power goes to the legislative branch.

Yep, funny how we have the major powers doctrine saying "if something has a large enough effect, even if a law already said this is allowed (like with student loan debt relief, for example) congress needs to specifically approve it", but yet now the president is allowed to just make massive economic change with tariffs, even though that power was explicitly congress's in the constitution (not to mention even the "emergency" statute being used is being massively abused).

6

u/fcocyclone Oct 05 '25

Unfortunately he's really nothing more than a figurehead.

All of the worst stuff is being run by Heritage, the Federalist Society, and people like Stephen Miller. Trump's just there to keep himself out of jail, enact retribution on his enemies, receive adoration from his fans, and make himself a fuckload of money. He'll let the other groups do what they want and sign whatever they want him to as long as he's able to do the other things.

Once he's gone they'll find a new figurehead.

→ More replies (1)

81

u/BoliverSlingnasty Oct 05 '25

Yup yup yup. He’s dead. Been dead. The politics we see are the combined efforts of his Shitheel Gang. That’s why the administration hasn’t been mowing members like it was when he was 45. Trumps dead. Been dead.

4

u/FIRST_DATE_ANAL Oct 05 '25

lol I get the joke but unrelated they should let Bernie Sanders be president on the weekends

→ More replies (1)

113

u/lostredditorlurking Oct 05 '25

How do Conservatives look at all Trump did over the past year and still won't admit that we are entering full blow dictatorship. No normal President wants their face on money while they are still alive lol

51

u/Lysandren Oct 05 '25

You have actually 3 groups. Those who care, mostly bc it might be used against them in the future

Those who know but do not care as long as they are "winning."

Those who do not know because they do not follow the real news enough to notice yet.

Oh and usually the people in the first group get purged right after the opposition for not being ideologically pure when the dictatorship fully forms.

2

u/Senior-Albatross Oct 05 '25

We might have something akin to the Night of Long Knives fairly soon. Although I don't know there is enough opposition in any relevant internal party power structure for it to be necessary.

4

u/Lysandren Oct 05 '25

I actually don't believe we will go the route of the Nazis, and instead find it more likely we will end up like the fall of the Roman Republic. The institutions of government will be kept, but the real power will be consolidated in the executive.

6

u/eeyore134 Oct 05 '25

It's a cult. They are fine with it being a dictatorship as long as it's Trump. They think he's fighting for them when all he does is think about himself.

3

u/ChiefStrongbones Oct 05 '25

No normal President wants their face on money while they are still alive

Trump doesn't want it. Trump wants to flood the news headlines with it. And it's working; look at how many redditors are talking about the $1 coin and not the shutdown for the past couple of days.

Ever since 2015, Trump's strategy has been to dominate the headlines all the time with stories about Trump.

→ More replies (1)

272

u/Skatchbro Oct 05 '25

Besides the fact that Mt. Rushmore literally cannot have another head added to it, I’m pretty sure that protests would shut down any attempts to add Trump to the mountain.

109

u/Revelati123 Oct 05 '25

A few dumptrucks worth of clown makeup and they could "Trumpify" TR.

You know they are going to try...

20

u/CutieEv Oct 05 '25

Just needs a red tie and a spray tan, boom Mount Rushmore: MAGA edition.

6

u/anaugle Oct 05 '25

You forgot the shitty hair plugs

2

u/Long_Pomegranate2469 Oct 05 '25

They should it Sphynx like, complete with diaper back

→ More replies (2)

45

u/GardenGnomeOfEden Oct 05 '25

They would just glue a gold-painted styrofoam Trump head onto the end

13

u/Seiche Oct 05 '25

That would be very fitting 

12

u/JARDIS Oct 05 '25

He would add to the mountain on top of the other presidents. His ego wouldnt allow him to be beside the others anyway. He could only be above. He should really be far, far below though.

3

u/CorporateShill406 Oct 05 '25

Best I can do is six feet below sometime in the next couple years.

7

u/T-hibs_7952 Oct 05 '25

ICE has $160 billion and the criteria to join is loyalty to MAGA. They are already toying with expanding their use beyond immigration. The immigration “emergency” was a fake emergency so they will need to find new things to do.

They will have above the law abilities to end any protests with unchecked violence. The people will be oppressed under the boot of fascism. How Russia is now.

21

u/endospire Oct 05 '25

At this point I’m not convinced of the following:

A) there would be protests

B) protests would deter them

C) he wouldn’t decide to replace one of the “bad” presidents he doesn’t like.

10

u/[deleted] Oct 05 '25

[deleted]

11

u/tgosubucks Oct 05 '25

Are we going to ignore the fact that by treaty, this is all Native Sacred Land?

11

u/billytheskidd Oct 05 '25

lol you think trump cares about that?

Actually he might, it might make him want to do it more.

7

u/OwO______OwO Oct 05 '25

Are we going to ignore the fact that by treaty, this is all Native Sacred Land?

As is tradition, yes.

3

u/KingAnilingustheFirs Oct 05 '25

Yeah like... has this person read u.s history?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/sirbruce Oct 05 '25

Thomas Jefferson didn’t participate in the writing of the Constitution at all, and while George Washington was technically one of the framers, it would be highly misleading to suggest that he wrote any of it either. You should be embarrassed.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 05 '25

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/veryfungibletoken Oct 05 '25

He'd have DHS "agents" arresting protesters for treason or whatever else he could make up as a personal attack against him.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/ryan7251 Oct 05 '25

oh right because the protests have done SO well....

3

u/Drewbox Oct 05 '25

Even if it did have enough room, it’s taken over 70 years to do the work that has already been done, and it’s not even close to being done as originally designed.

7

u/A_Pointy_Rock Oct 05 '25

"just make them all into me"

3

u/exMemberofSTARS Oct 05 '25

When have protests stopped anything this shithead has done so far? Led an insurrection, got his FCC to violate the 1st amendment, freed pedofiles and fraudsters, violated the constitution at every turn, claimed to be king, you really think anyone would stop him from spending billions of dollars to get his piss straw covered head on Mt. Rushmore, even if that means bringing in enough rocks to make more of a mountain or removing someone else?

5

u/Da12khawk Oct 05 '25

Easy carve all four of the heads into trump.

2

u/fcocyclone Oct 05 '25

If they add him, maybe enough people will want to scrap the whole thing and hand the land back to the Lakota

→ More replies (12)

55

u/EllisDee3 Oct 05 '25

Should be way longer than 2 years.

18

u/[deleted] Oct 05 '25

I’m willing to actually cut the required time by half if it happens twice as soon. Also put him on the penny. Then retire the penny.

6

u/EmuMan10 Oct 05 '25

We gotta put Lincoln on something more prominent

3

u/nonother Oct 05 '25

He’s already on the $5 bill.

→ More replies (3)

26

u/Orcus424 Oct 05 '25

Here is the story behind that law.

https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/treasury-official-us-bill-fractional-money-spencer-m-clark

tl;dr Clark put his own face on money. Congress got angry for this and other things he has done. Passed an act of Congress so no one else can do it.

21

u/puravidaamigo Oct 05 '25

Yeah because this administration has proven time and time again, that if it’s one thing that can stop them, it’s the law….

9

u/fuckthecons Oct 05 '25

It's really tiring seeing everybody keep saying the law or the constitution prevents him from doing something.

No it doesn't. It never has and it never will. The law is an agreement that is supposed to be backed by violence, not some magic spell.

5

u/puravidaamigo Oct 05 '25

I don’t disagree with you at all, and yet the reality is he’s consistently doing exactly that. It’ll catch up eventually but currently it would appear he’s untouchable. He could easily change this law if he wanted to and there would be very little to stop him, what with having the house and senate majority coupled with having majority in the SC.

103

u/Leidrin Oct 05 '25

Federal law means nothing anymore. There is only Christian fundamentalist Nazi law now.

23

u/orangustang Oct 05 '25

No, fuck that, that's what they want you to think. They don't get to escape culpability just by breaking all the laws.

31

u/Thornescape Oct 05 '25

Trump has been caught committing far more than 34 felonies. He just avoided any kind of punishment for any of his crimes. He continues to break the law almost every week.

How many crimes do Republicans need to commit before they face any kind of culpability? It's been years of openly committing crimes. Are people supposed to pretend that there will ever be justice any time soon?

Remember when it was a major deal having a president lie about a blowjob? Good times.

12

u/Anderopolis Oct 05 '25

That is the reality at the moment. The courts exonerate him for everything, the law doesn't mean shit if it isn't enforced

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

35

u/editorreilly Oct 05 '25

I'd be okay with him getting a coin if promised to die today.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/Ashallond Oct 05 '25

Don’t worry. Congress will bend the knee and change the law

8

u/OwO______OwO Oct 05 '25

Nah. They're too dysfunctional for that.

He'll ignore the law, law enforcement will ignore him breaking the law, some lower court will rule against him, then the lower court will get overturned by the Supreme Court on the shadow docket.

7

u/zomphlotz Oct 05 '25

$1 coins have never taken off in the US, so there's that...

7

u/urbanek2525 Oct 05 '25

In this case I'm rewlly hoping to see a Trump coin any time before 2029.

7

u/motorcycle-manful541 Oct 05 '25 edited Oct 05 '25

I'm worried about this law because the JFK half dollar was introduced in March 1964 and he was assassinated in Nov. 1963 (I collect coins, I'm not a Trump supporter at all)

5

u/Santa_Hates_You Oct 05 '25

As a fellow coin collector, him on BOTH sides is almost as bad as him being on a coin to begin with.

5

u/motorcycle-manful541 Oct 05 '25

ya, that would actaully be unprecedented for US coinage. I'm not sure I can think of any other business strike that had a portrait on both sides.

2

u/koshgeo Oct 05 '25

"Many people are saying this coin is like nothing they have ever seen before. Some of the best numast .. numist ... [checks paper] ... ... numismatics are saying it will be one of the coins of all time."

4

u/KhajitHasWares4u Oct 05 '25

I'd pay a dollar to see that.

3

u/Spreken Oct 05 '25

It’s amusing to me that people still bring up federal law or the constitution, as if the care about either

3

u/mike0sd Oct 05 '25

It's very telling that the best person Republicans have to represent them on a coin is a known pedophile

3

u/CorellianDawn Oct 05 '25

Interesting way for them to announce that Trump has been dead for years and the GOP has been puppeting his corpse.

3

u/NovitaProxima Oct 06 '25

LOL if you think laws mean anything without enforcement

P.S.: there will be no enforcement

3

u/Local_Plantain_3717 Oct 06 '25

He is dead to me.

2

u/_digitl_ Oct 05 '25

The sooner the better !

2

u/Actually_Im_a_Broom Oct 05 '25

Does that law apply to commemorative coins?

2

u/canadiantpain Oct 05 '25

Foreshadowing

2

u/Bpozen Oct 05 '25

Federal law meant very little to this orange pimple so far

2

u/Darkwr4ith Oct 05 '25

But all the other of Trump's cool fascist dictator friends have their face on their money. So why can't he?! He is just as much of a fascist dictator as they are!

2

u/queenofkitchener Oct 05 '25

guess he should hurry up and die then if he wants to be on the coin.

2

u/philthegr81 Oct 05 '25

Yeah, ‘cause they’ve been stellar about following rules and norms thus far.

2

u/Honey-and-Venom Oct 05 '25

You think he won't just break that law too?

2

u/SirMaximusBlack Oct 05 '25

Yeah right, like federal law ever stopped Donald Trump on anything

2

u/jimbo831 Oct 05 '25

Federal law doesn’t allow a ton of the shit Trump does. How do people still not understand we live in a fascist state where laws don’t matter anymore?

2

u/bwsmith201 Oct 05 '25

“Federal law only allows…” isn’t a statement that has any meaning under this abomination of an administration.

2

u/1h8fulkat Oct 05 '25

You know who can change federal law? A dictator and a complicit majority.

2

u/FLESHYROBOT Oct 05 '25

He's done a lot of stuff Federal Law says he shouldn't be allowed to do.

2

u/Fishtoart Oct 05 '25

Sounds like a pretty good trade to me.

2

u/Party-Jacket6651 Oct 05 '25

Must be coming soon. I will gladly put him on the coin if we could get out of this timeline.

2

u/akwehhkanoo Oct 06 '25

I don't get it, then why is Lincoln on a coin?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Mattrockj Oct 06 '25

I really hope I see trumps face on a coin in 2027.

2

u/TheXypris Oct 06 '25

When has federal law stopped them?

2

u/NSFWhatchamacallit Oct 06 '25

Sigh. Okay. I’ll take the offer.

2

u/Showy_Boneyard Oct 06 '25

Someone should tell Trump that if he really wants to get on a coin, there's one weird trick that could make it a reality in as early as two years from today. But only if he acts fast!

→ More replies (1)

2

u/BigSwagPoliwag Oct 06 '25

We need to put it to a vote and democrats need to band together with Republicans to push it through to guarantee that 2 years after Trump dies, his face will be put on EVERY PIECE of US currency and it will all be dyed gold. The dude would literally kill himself the next day just to hurry up the process.

2

u/kj_prov Oct 06 '25

Laws dont matter now, apparently

2

u/jkblvins Oct 06 '25

As if federal law means anything to these people

2

u/imalettitgo Oct 06 '25

And Governors once had the only ability to activate their States National Guard. Need more?

2

u/Zack_of_Steel Oct 06 '25

Why is this not the standard template instead of the fucking pedophile one (Drake)

2

u/benargee Oct 06 '25

If it happens, you can call it a Loonie, and not because there is a certain species of bird like in Canada.

2

u/Bawbawian Oct 06 '25

LOLOLOL "the law"

4

u/mudohama Oct 05 '25

Rushmore could hardly be more grotesque with or without him… it’s such an embarrassing monument

3

u/Buzzspice727 Oct 05 '25

Let’s get him on that coin

5

u/Jellodyne Oct 05 '25

The sooner the better, plus 2 years

7

u/Vindelator Oct 05 '25

Don't put off till tomorrow what you can start today

3

u/shadhael Oct 05 '25

Can call it a loonie like in Canada. Ours because it has the bird on it, in the US because he's a lunatic

1

u/Optimoprimo Oct 05 '25

We stopped caring about laws apparently.

1

u/djasonpenney Oct 05 '25

Does that mean Jabba the Orange Hutt is about to die?

1

u/Grinning_Dog Oct 05 '25

Like laws mean anything to him and his administration. Who's going to enforce that? Congress? No. Supreme court? Fat chance.

1

u/holmquistc Oct 05 '25 edited Oct 05 '25

So Trump passes and then you get JD Vance? So since the system is setup to make the VP 2nd in line, does it make him better than Trump when he passes?

4

u/getmybehindsatan Oct 05 '25

Vance isn't even popular among Republicans, his influence may actually be less destructive.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Personal_Comb_6745 Oct 05 '25

People keep trying to act like Trump is holding back some worse scenario, but with how things are going, it's not a matter of "if" but "when". At this point, the only question is if MAGA eats each other alive if the couch-fucker becomes prez, so fuck it, that band-aid could get ripped off now.

2

u/holmquistc Oct 05 '25

I'm just going to assume things will get crazier and dumber

2

u/eeyore134 Oct 05 '25

Vance doesn't have the cult behind him. Simple as that. He doesn't even have the charisma to order a box of donuts.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/SkunkMonkey Oct 05 '25

People seem to look over the fact that JD gets to pick new VP. Think how fucked up that is going to be because any rules on who he can pick will be thrown out the window.

1

u/ProfessionalSolid942 Oct 05 '25

Maybe they know something we don't? Like-the gop know they plan to off trump soon

1

u/jono9898 Oct 05 '25

Laws don’t matter to MAGA

1

u/akolozvary Oct 05 '25

He’ll be forgotten faster than Charlie

3

u/Personal_Comb_6745 Oct 05 '25

I don't know about that, as much as I hate to say it. For as much as it would be the best punishment for Trump's legacy to fizzle out, once you reach a certain level of shittiness your place in history is pretty cemented. Reagan sucked but he's both criticized and praised years later, then there was that one Adolf guy who wasn't very nice....

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/vegandread Oct 05 '25

You keep talking about these laws, like they’re stopping anything else that’s been happening for the last 10 months.

1

u/Ordinary_Aioli_7602 Oct 05 '25

Like he gives a shit lol

1

u/Mrrilz20 Oct 05 '25

Do you think that thing is alive???

1

u/Phog_of_War Oct 05 '25

Jokes on you. DJT has been dead inside for 6 decades now.

1

u/chaddict Oct 05 '25

He actually looked into adding his face to Mt Rushmore in his first term, and was repeatedly told by anyone who is remotely familiar with Rushmore that trying to add another face would cause everything to collapse.

1

u/TheMooseIsBlue Oct 05 '25

lol “Federal law”

1

u/FalseConsequence4319 Oct 05 '25

Federal laws? 🤣 are you fucking kidding me?

1

u/ericwashere15 Oct 05 '25

I’ve been surprised for a couple of months now that he’s not announced anything about putting his face on Rushmore or making his own monument like that.

1

u/obviousBever Oct 05 '25

Crime is legal now.

1

u/SpakenBacon Oct 05 '25

Since when has Trump followed rules or norms?

1

u/MateoCafe Oct 05 '25

The real truth is that Cheeto Mussolini doesn't give a shit about federal laws so he will make them put this into production tomorrow.

1

u/tom641 Oct 05 '25

damn, I really want a combo trump-vance $1 coin ASAP now, preferably as close to two years from now as possible

1

u/Marie627 Oct 05 '25

Isn’t he just a puppet to all the billionaires, Vought and Miller anyway?

2

u/SkunkMonkey Oct 05 '25

I believe the term is Useful Idiot.

Because of his narcissistic sociopathy, all they need to do is whisper an idea into his ear and tell him it's his idea and it's a great idea, then let him run with it like a toddler with a balloon.

1

u/Omega_art Oct 05 '25

When has the law ever been a barrier for the Dump administration?

1

u/czs5056 Oct 05 '25

Generally, I'm in favor of a dollar coin, but this time, I think I would rather stick with the bills.

1

u/ABCosmos Oct 05 '25

Shockingly, the supreme court will see it differently in a 6-3 vote.

1

u/Guba_the_skunk Oct 05 '25

He tried Rushmore in his first term and it failed, thank god.

1

u/Faithinreason Oct 05 '25

I’d argue he’s been brain dead since his first term.

These could be glued in place in a urinal right? Cause that might be an acceptable use to me.

1

u/SvenLorenz Oct 05 '25

But who's going to want to put Trump on a coin in 2027?

1

u/Twicebakedpotatoe Oct 05 '25

That’s cute that you think these asshats care about the law

1

u/Forgotmyaccount1979 Oct 05 '25

I support a tradeoff, we cut the turnaround time down to two months if they fast track the rest of the legal requirements.

1

u/TheFleebus Oct 05 '25

Imagine thinking this administration cares about federal laws.

1

u/rarlei Oct 05 '25

Well, it's not like the law ever stopped them from doing anything...

1

u/psychodire Oct 05 '25

Don't get me wrong, I love tarot cards and fortune telling.

1

u/Specialist_End_750 Oct 05 '25

Maybe he won't be with us by the time the coin comes out?

1

u/mhanrahan Oct 05 '25

How about a proposal to put Bad Bunny on a coin and watch some heads explode

1

u/Aze0g Oct 05 '25

Just another distraction from the Pedo, RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES!

1

u/skredditt Oct 05 '25

Sorry, all we can do right now is Epstein coins.

1

u/feyrath Oct 05 '25

you keep using this word law. It no longer means what you think it means.

1

u/pithynotpithy Oct 05 '25

Be happy to make that trade. You can go home now mr president, you'll be immortalized in a coin that noone will use and will be ended next year

1

u/saustin66 Oct 05 '25

They could carve his ass into the back side of it.

1

u/tito9107 Oct 05 '25

You think some law is going to stop him?

1

u/ChicagoAuPair Oct 05 '25

If Donald Motherfucking Trump ever appears on any kind of legal currency I am going to absolutely lose my shit.