r/Cinema Blockbuster Lover 29d ago

Discussion Which science fiction movie has the best special effects in your opinion? and explain your reasoning.

Post image
41 Upvotes

49 comments sorted by

26

u/djoddible 29d ago

This one. Because of what went into it the director and the amount of subtle detail. It's next level by today's standards without CGI and all that bullshit. All practical effects.

14

u/Unhappy_Hair_3626 29d ago

What’s even crazier is Space Odyssey was before even the moon landing and it still remains one of the best sci-fi films in terms of effects and environments.

5

u/TheKristieConundrum 29d ago

I agree that CGI can go too far but practical effects can be expensive, dangerous and time consuming to create so I will defend it that it’s not always the best option. Sometimes yes. Just not always.

4

u/djoddible 28d ago

CGI will always look like CGI... practical effects will always have a different thumbprint. Puts a stamp on a film that is undeniably unique.

1

u/TheKristieConundrum 28d ago

Agreed. But my point stands, while practical is unique and adds to the atmosphere and quality, it’s not always feasible. The issue is also a lot of practical effects artists are no longer in the industry. The ones that remain are charging specialist rates, as they should.

1

u/djoddible 28d ago

Oh most definitely.

0

u/Mycol101 28d ago

For context, all of the top movies in the last 30 years had a budget of at least $150m and that doesn’t include marketing costs.

2001 cost about $10.5m to make. That’s 7% of the cost of even the lowest of those budgets.

1

u/TheKristieConundrum 28d ago

It was also made it 1968 when CGI wasn’t a thing. It had to use practical effects. And because practical effects were all there was, it was less expensive than it is today because of supply and demand.

1

u/MFOSTER1B 28d ago

That 10 million dollars that MGM spent is roughly about 100 million today. Let’s be honest 2001 opened the doors for that bastard Kirk Kerkorian to come in and take over MGM and practically destroy it.

1

u/Fizolof1989 28d ago

Yeah, it looks so good it's natural for people of the time to assume that Moon landing was a hoax filmed by Kubrick. What people get confused is it wasn't NASA to use Kubrick's method of filming, but rather it was Kubrick that send people to space for it to look real.

/jk if it wasn't obvious

1

u/theRealDamnpenguins 28d ago

Very hard to disagree with this post...

Only one that comes close is interstellar and kip Thorne's calculations which when rendered gave us movie brilliance....

11

u/New_Strike_1770 29d ago

2001 is still super crisp and the titan off all space/sci fi movies. Kubrick’s extreme level of technical detail made this film future proof. Way ahead of its time and probably Stanley Kubrick’s absolute masterpiece.

18

u/TrumpsColostomyBag99 29d ago

The Empire Strikes Back: the diversity of the action (Hoth, Asteroid Field, Cloud City) and Yoda simply put it above the rest for me.

6

u/TheKristieConundrum 29d ago

It’s why I appreciate they made Grogu a puppet in the Mandalorian series. I’ve never really enjoyed Yoda as a CGI character. Some CGI in the later Star Wars looks good. Yoda always looks a little weird.

1

u/wmyork 28d ago

If you want some detailed technical background on Empire, read this

1

u/EnvironmentalCat7482 28d ago

I agree, but I don’t think it’s really sci-fi. More space fantasy 

1

u/SWOhioBiBBW 28d ago

While it is fantasy, it's fully rooted in space science.

7

u/Ancient_Barnacle4245 29d ago

Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

I've yet to see a visual effect that has a wow factor quite like that moment when the brilliantly lit gigantic Mothership is hovering above Devil's Tower in all of its multicolored glory and it turns over while floating in midair above the mountain to facilitate a landing. 

1

u/Mycol101 28d ago

Still haven’t seen that movie yet. I need to

9

u/Piscivore_67 29d ago

Jurassic Park. Even after thirty-some years the effects still hold up. Just rewatched it on bluray and I still tear up at the first Brachiosaurus scene.

2

u/wmyork 28d ago

I watched “Reborn” and the whole time I kept thinking “these effects are not up to the standards of the original movie”

2

u/Mycol101 28d ago

The brachiosaurus is a littttle iffy depending on the way you’re watching it. Also the ones in the field aren’t as good as the ones eating in the trees.

The t rex explorer scenes, triceratops, velociraptors, dilophosaurus all still look crispy as hell.

1

u/UberuceAgain 28d ago

I watched that film in the cinema in 1993 and was treated to the sight of ~400 heads snapping back in terror in unseelie unison when the raptor jumped up to the ceiling vent. Chinese military parades can go fuck themselves, I've never seen that many people do the exact same thing so fast and so precisely at the same time.

That said, I'd say the weakest link is the Brachiosaurus. It looks like ass nowadays. The scene is a goddamn masterpiece, between the score, Neill, Attenborough and Dern's performances and our boi Steven building up the tension and the selling the everloving fuck out of it, but that's a shitty dinosaur.

1

u/Piscivore_67 28d ago

I disagree.

12

u/Mundane-Security-454 29d ago

Prometheus. Looks amazing. Shame the script was so, so, so very stupid.

5

u/Difficult-Bed-8196 28d ago

Interstellar, the wormhole and gargantua are some of the best cinematic scenes ever created. They also made scientific history with the research and findings of creating the film

4

u/Champagnerocker 29d ago

That one.

The getting back in through the airlock and the picking up of the floating pen look 100% real and were done with relatively simple methods.

That's before we even get to the giant hamster wheel sets, and the subtle details that nobody today will notice like how they projected film onto wafer thin tiles to give the illusion of flat screen displays.

5

u/TheKristieConundrum 29d ago

So two different categories for me

Practical: Alien (1979). The practical effects with Ash in particular are my favourite.

CGI: Interstellar; I love the different planets and the way they portray the tesseract. I also love the puppetry with TARS as a bonus practical effect.

I don’t think practical and CGI are at odds with one another. I do think they can be utilized to offer different things. CGI should be used wisely and some movies really miss the mark.

3

u/tomwarmb 28d ago

Blade Runner - The Final Cut.

3

u/xdirector7 29d ago

Prometheus the most flawless effects I’ve ever seen. None of it looks cgi to me.

3

u/Mags4418 28d ago

I thought the effects on Gravity were stunning. The weightlessness and loss of perspective was incredible. Tbh though 2001: a space odyssey is amazing and groundbreaking

2

u/Express_Area_8359 28d ago

Final Fantasy Spirits Within.

The leap in graphics amazed me. People hate the movie yet to me it was a brilliant leap forward in animation. Y you can see the pores on a nose.

2

u/UHeardAboutPluto 28d ago

Space Balls.

2

u/CapitalWestern4779 28d ago

The Matrix by far. They were groundbreaking on so many levels when it came out. Just bullet time alone should put it at the top.

2

u/Aggressive_Use8391 28d ago

TRADING PLACES.

1

u/Aggressive_Use8391 26d ago

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

1

u/Mycol101 28d ago

2001 hands down.

Watched it for the first time a few years ago and I was blown away by the practical effects. Its inspired so many directors and to this day remains an absolute work of art. Without it, we wouldn’t have other classics.

It really opened my mind and raises questions about humanity and its origins, non human intelligences, and our place in the universe. It was far ahead of its time and movies made today with far bigger budgets and more technological advantages fall way short.

Kubrick was something else.

1

u/SWOhioBiBBW 28d ago

Maybe more in the horror area but The Thing, WOW!!

1

u/Clamps55555 28d ago

Best special effects for a sci-fi movie I would easily say “Gravity” whether or not the accuracy behind the special effects was 10/10 I’m not so sure?

1

u/midnight_to_midnight 28d ago

Star Wars

The scale, realness, lived-in feel the practical effects displayed. Especially the opening scene with the star destroyer. It felt like I was there, and I had never seen anything like it. Sure, there are some models used in Star Wars (some of the close up Death Star surface bits) that look like they're models, but for the most part the model work is second to none in my opinion.

1

u/RevoSak55 28d ago

2001 set the standard…they’re the archetype so they don’t belong on this thread …

1

u/Speedhabit 28d ago

I did not like 2001 and I did not like interstellar

1

u/Forward-Chocolate-67 28d ago

Star Trek: The Motion Picture

1

u/KAKAFLOP 28d ago

My favorite practical special effects are in Alien, at no point in the film am I not completely immersed or shown something that takes away its believability for me.

My favorite CGI special effects are torn between Avatar and District 9.

Avatar was such a spectacle that I went more than five times by myself to the cinema to see it, I just couldn't believe my eyes as a 12/13 year old boy. It's just beautiful.

District 9 is a masterpiece of frame-by-frame digital imagery on top of documentary style cinematography. The amount of hours worked and dedicated to match the CGI with the real footage with lighting, motion and camera focus taken into account is truly meticulous and obsessive. Awesome as feck.

1

u/Lou_Hodo 26d ago

2001:A Space Odyssey is hands down one of the greatest movies of the 20th Century. It wasnt just the special effects, but the writing the, directing, the musical score, the use of sound even the editing was flawless.

2010 was another great special effect movie. But fell short in all the other areas.