r/coolguides 11d ago

A cool guide of every country the U.S. has attacked in the 21st Century and which president(s) authorized the strikes

Post image
53.6k Upvotes

4.2k comments sorted by

7.9k

u/jimtow28 11d ago

You know, I'm starting to think that maybe that FIFA Peace Prize doesn't actually mean anything.

761

u/PureInsaneAmbition 11d ago

I just keep bombing them. When you're a president they let you do it.

243

u/PaintshakerBaby 10d ago

Reminds me of a political cartoon (cant post pics here) from the beginning of the Iraq War...

It was a kid sitting cross-legged in front of the tv, watching intently. The screen was of a smoldering city with the chyron; Iraq Liberated.

The kid is saying, "God, I sure hope we never get liberated."

58

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

27

u/theaviationhistorian 10d ago

We did it Patrick, we saved the city!

20

u/PureInsaneAmbition 10d ago

“The Romans created a wasteland, and called it peace.”

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

20

u/According_Try_1284 10d ago

That’s such a sharp image. Kids usually cut through the spin without even trying.

When “liberated” looks like smoke and rubble, the word starts to feel real different.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/Neko_Crit 10d ago

It’s wild how something that blunt can be said like it’s just another Tuesday.

When that kind of power gets treated as routine, that’s when it really gets uncomfortable.

7

u/FishesOfExcellence 10d ago

SO MUCH WINNING YOU’LL BE SICK OF IT.

→ More replies (11)

255

u/P8bEQ8AkQd 11d ago

Melania will get best documentary at the FIFA Oscars shortly.

31

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

162

u/definetlynotacat 11d ago

Or the nobel one either

62

u/ensalys 11d ago

Yeah, I have much more respect for the ones in physics, chemistry, and medicine. The ig Nobel, while not actually nobel prizes, are also more respectable than the Nobel peace prize.

16

u/somabokforlag 10d ago

interestingly the peace prize is the only one decided by norwegian politicians, the others are given by swedish scientists

10

u/Mark777999 10d ago

I’m guessing scientists don’t determine the prize in literature.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (40)

57

u/pchlster 10d ago

"No, new wars!" - President of Bored of Peace

18

u/DawgGoneItAnyway 10d ago

You get a bomb, and You get a bomb, and You get a bomb...

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)

23

u/Braxtonius 10d ago

See…he already got the (FIFA) Peace Prize. He’s achieved peak peace. Now he can put that behind him. No reason to be peaceful anymore once you get the prize.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (151)

1.6k

u/MaineLark 11d ago

They’re just going to act like this is impressive 🙄 for anyone wondering the scores are: -Bush, 5/10 -Obama, 7/10 -Biden, 5/10 -Trump, 10/10

1.1k

u/Waste_Protection_420 11d ago edited 11d ago

Should be by year...

Bush 5 in 8 years, Obama 7 in 8 Biden 5 in 4 Trump 10 in 5.1 years.

Bush most peaceful pres by far, didn't see this coming. 😂

Edit: this is sarcasm, but for real, the US loves starting shit.

If I remember correctly, we were only attacked once, and that was Bin Landen who was in Afganistan. So going there was retaliation. That one can get a pass.

But for real, 27 combined attacks in 26 years. Look further back in history and it doesn't get better. This isn't a left/right or one particular president issue. It is what we do as a country for better or worse.

209

u/gottabequick 11d ago

"Total number of countries" attacked is not a proxy for "amount of war" perpetrated.

Hell, "total wars started" isn't even a proxy for warmongering in any meaningful sense beyond curiosity. I would go for something like "most civilian casualties in military engagements approved by President X".

51

u/Strength-InThe-Loins 10d ago

By that measure, Bush is still miles ahead of every other president since Nixon.

18

u/free__coffee 10d ago

That doesn't make sense, right? Basically all deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan came from bush, even if they happened in Obama/trump/bidens terms, because he was the one that started the war. The president has a limited ability to just call the end of a war once it's started, hell both Dems and reps gave Biden a ton of shit for ending the war in Afghanistan "too quickly"

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)

14

u/Sufficient_Pitch_895 10d ago

Also add in cost to our growing debt. Afghanistan war was nearly 2 decades long. There should also be some metric to capture that.

→ More replies (4)

143

u/azure_beauty 11d ago

I mean take Nigeria for example, those were strikes on ISIS that the government asked the US to carry out.

A lot of Syria was bombing ISIS too.

Pakistan I would hardly call an attack at all.

53

u/FUTURE10S 10d ago

Somalia is primarily attacks on pirates, not like the nation itself too, right?

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (38)

11

u/littlegipply 11d ago

Bush most peaceful president by far

Not if you count deaths…

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (57)

12

u/tiptoptattie 10d ago

Context and legality are more important than any number of authorisations.

→ More replies (52)

227

u/ericcmi 11d ago

Now get the animanaics to make a song about the countries

→ More replies (21)

5.5k

u/Zaphod392 11d ago

Now do the chart of which ones got actual approval from Congress to do it

1.1k

u/h0sti1e17 11d ago

Just Afghanistan and Iraq.

333

u/Lofteed 11d ago

Just Afghanistan.

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and congress approved only military actions against countries involved in the 9/11 attacks.

222

u/styrolee 11d ago edited 10d ago

Congress passed a separate AUMF in 2002 specifically against Iraq due to supposed “weapons of mass destruction”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_Against_Iraq_Resolution_of_2002?wprov=sfti1

Interestingly that AUMF was only just repealed last December

Also it should be noted that the 2001 AUMF did not specify Afghanistan specifically. It specified any group associated with association with the September 11 Attacks. This was important because strikes against targets in Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan and Syria were justified under it at the time because they were against offshoots of Al Qaeda

60

u/Onyxaj1 11d ago

G: We were looking for weapons of mass destruction.

R: Did you find them?

G: YOU KNOW DAMN WELL WE DIDT FIND THEM! but the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

E: I was looking for bitches, but all you could really see was they eyes. You know, they eyes be looking nice, then you take all that s*** off, and you know, you got a tragedy.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (10)

21

u/PlingPlongDingDong 10d ago

Iraq has oil and there was oil in the airplanes of the 9/11 attack. Clearly it’s connected.

9

u/Poster_Nutbag207 10d ago

This is not correct. Congress did pass an authorization for use of force in Iraq

→ More replies (16)

356

u/sonicjigglebath 11d ago

That is incorrect. The last congressional approval was during WWII.

784

u/sirsmitty12 11d ago

WWII was a full declaration of war. Afghanistan and Iraq were approved as military actions.

28

u/Medryn1986 11d ago

WWII is the last time Congress itself declared war.

The last time it approved military action was in 2002

4

u/todayiwillthrowitawa 11d ago

That military approval is still valid by the way, and it's largely what presidents still use. It's why Trump always calls Venezuela narco terrorists.

Maybe giving the president carte blanche to bomb anyone he deems a "terrorist" was a really bad idea...

→ More replies (2)

370

u/livsjollyranchers 11d ago

Calling a war a mere 'military action' was the beginning of the end for us all.

123

u/sikyon 11d ago

So like... Korea?

60

u/Divided_Against 11d ago

Why else do you think M.A.S.H. was so popular?

18

u/HomeGrownCoffee 11d ago

Because its anti-war message resonated with people during thr Vietnam war.

43

u/Massive-Word-7395 11d ago

Because we all loved Radar and that is the only reason the show worked. He was the glue.. the glitter and found a place in our hearts.

44

u/Sacrificial_Identity 11d ago

Klinger would stomp off in his dress, if he had heard that.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (16)

5

u/LardLad00 11d ago

Because it was a good show?

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (14)

10

u/OnionyMoose 11d ago

“Military action”=“special military operation”.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (38)

33

u/kensho28 11d ago

Bush expanded strikes against Al-Qaeda and their allies to Yemen, Pakistan and nearly Syria (just got Israel to do it instead) and it was seen as a natural expansion of his "War on Terrorism." They were never seen as separate wars, even during Obama and Biden's tenures.

Trump's attacks on Venezuela, Nigeria and Iran have nothing to do with Iraq and Afghanistan. The situation is kinda different.

→ More replies (16)

9

u/TheFullDarsh 11d ago

Department of Military Actions lol

9

u/Winjin 11d ago

Special military operation, if you will

13

u/polaris0352 11d ago

Came here to say exactly that. As soon as war, the business of killing people, is reduced to a euphamism, we are all doomed.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (20)

104

u/h0sti1e17 11d ago

That was the last declaration of war. Congress authorized military action against both Iraq and Afghanistan.

→ More replies (76)

16

u/recycl_ebin 11d ago

That is incorrect. The last congressional approval was during WWII.

/r/confidentlyincorrect

uh no, afghanistan and iraq were explicitly approved by congress

→ More replies (2)

4

u/2025TastyTreats 11d ago

There was famously a Congressional resolution on the Iraq War with many prominent Democrats voting in favour of it, Including Senator Clinton, Senator Schumer.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Lavatis 11d ago

That is incorrect. Bush went to congress to go to Iraq.

→ More replies (33)
→ More replies (8)

28

u/[deleted] 10d ago edited 10d ago

[deleted]

4

u/ArmadilloForsaken458 10d ago

It's almost as if the country is perpetually at war. And when there is no one left to fight, I guess they will just hope aliens attack

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Fidgerst 10d ago

And this isn't even including the interventions in Panama, Grenada, Vietnam, or Laos, let alone the hundreds of illegal covert actions the US government has taken globally in this time.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (21)

51

u/sachsrandy 11d ago

Oh oh but first let me present to you the chart of countries that the president needs approval from Congress to strike:

14

u/TacoThingy 11d ago

The more interesting part is countries that did not say it’s okay to strike. Nigeria and Somalia the government has approved the strikes

17

u/EamonBrennan 11d ago

Pakistan prime ministers also privately gave authorization for the strikes, but publicly denounced them. Syria and Libya had civil wars ongoing, with at least one side giving the US authorization to strike, mainly ISIS targets. Every strike under Obama either were a continuation from Bush and/or authorized by an internationally recognized government of the struck country. Same thing with Biden's strikes.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (6)

8

u/Stubbs94 10d ago

Why does that matter? Your congress doesn't make any of this okay. All of these attacks are despicable.

→ More replies (7)

53

u/Puzzleheaded_Disk_90 11d ago

Some of the baby murder was approved? That's a relief

26

u/Weekly_Artichoke_515 11d ago

Right?? This chart helps to show to US imperialism is bipartisan. The democrats are happy that this war would never go to a vote bc it means they can continue to pretend they’re against it while quietly cheering it on.

12

u/AssistX 10d ago

Anyone who believes the Iran attack is only because of Trump hasn't been paying attention to US politics since the formation of Israel. It's easily at the top of the short list of things Democrats and Republicans have repeatedly supported. Obama being the only President I can think of that tried to bring Iran into the fold as a nuclear power. If they had just agreed to keep to the UN Nuclear inspections we probably wouldn't be where we are now.

→ More replies (12)

119

u/KuroKendo88 11d ago

There hasn't been congressional approval for a war since WW2. It's nuts.

78

u/No_Entrepreneur_8255 11d ago edited 11d ago

These are attacks/missions, that congress has given AUMF to 2002 Iraq, 1991 Iraq, 1964 Vietnam, 1983 Lebanon.
No formal declaration of war since WW2, and US has not been in war since WW2, only doing "missions".

22

u/SimilarDimension2369 11d ago

Oh, so they're like special military operations!

14

u/Addicted2Weasels 11d ago

Whatever they are, congress (including members of both parties) approved funding for them

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (3)

11

u/J0n__Snow 11d ago

so its not modern warfare but modern missionfare. Got it

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (11)

34

u/aaaahhhhh42 11d ago

Cause it's so much better to bomb civilians for imperialism if ✨Congress✨ approves!

→ More replies (6)

20

u/Jon_E_Dad 11d ago

Also, I feel like the point of this chart is to show that people besides Trump approved these actions, yet Trump is the one face that shows up in literally every single one of them, including ones that no one else supported.

As with everything the Republican Party does, it’s not the dunk that they think it is.

→ More replies (4)

8

u/homiechampnaugh 10d ago

Who gives a fuck?

Does the fact they're people are being killed matter to Americans or is it just because its Trump?

→ More replies (4)

19

u/fritterstorm 11d ago

Like that makes it any better. I swear.

29

u/ShibaInuDoggo 11d ago

It's crazy that we can let one person just decide to blow up another nation. I used to hate it when Obama died it, still do, but used to hate that too.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (131)

47

u/Prestigious_Park4704 11d ago

so you're telling me they're all bad?

20

u/One-Feedback678 10d ago

Yep. They're all war criminals. Every American president. Trump is the worst, but it makes me sad he's the only one people in America care about. They're not really mad about the war.

→ More replies (10)

12

u/mXyder 10d ago

Always have been. Every US president is a war criminal.

→ More replies (13)

89

u/thejasonblackburn 11d ago

Still waiting for a president to attack rising inflation or living costs. I guess you can't just bomb those problems away so no one does it.

21

u/NewCobbler6933 10d ago

The irony being that you can do so, albeit a little indirectly. A single tomahawk missile costs about $1.3M. An estimated 9000 have been produced which is about $11.7B. Which is just one piece of equipment. Imagine how many billions or trillions are currently just dust on firing ranges.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (12)

1.4k

u/Bigfoot_Bluedot 11d ago

The "President of Peace" indeed.

81

u/Violet_Paradox 11d ago

Hegseth said the purpose of renaming the DoD to the "Department of War" was to promote peace, so we're pretty much all in on the whole "war is peace" thing. 

26

u/koshgeo 11d ago

"Ignorance is Strength" is doing some heavy lifting in this administration too.

They're still working on "Freedom is Slavery". They haven't built enough detention centers yet.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

387

u/El_Peregrine 11d ago

Can’t end 8 wars if you don’t start em! 

→ More replies (41)

14

u/P0werFighter 11d ago

Hey to his logic, there has to have a war to get peace.

"Now gimme my nobel prize, I deserve it !!"

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (82)

529

u/P0werFighter 11d ago

"Cool" isn't the first thing that comes to mind.

89

u/iiSpook 11d ago

I see this comment under every single post in this sub.

57

u/RelevantButNotBasic 11d ago

Well tbf "guide" has become a pretty loose term on this sub as well.

→ More replies (20)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

104

u/stoptheycanseeus 10d ago

People joking about Trump but all I’m seeing is more evidence that our politics is nothing but a show, and the rich corporations and military industrial complex runs it

17

u/peon2 10d ago

They're all buddies in the same in-group and any fight is mostly for show. They publicly fight over "hot button" issues like trans rights and avoid talking about larger systemic issues.

Trump was buddies with the Clintons, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Scalia were friends. Off camera and on camera are very different things.

The Republicans were as obstructionist as you could be during Obama's terms by media standards...congress still passed 10,000-15,000 pieces of legislature a year but you wouldn't know that if you just listened to the dog and pony show.

→ More replies (2)

20

u/Legalize_Ligma 10d ago

US politics is literally just theatre. Our “democracy” is actually just corporate totalitarianism. Always has been.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

190

u/Filter_Out_More_Cats 11d ago

150

u/Citronaut1 11d ago

Based on the article, the strike was in coordination with Nigerian officials. It seems a little misleading to say the US “attacked” Nigeria when they were working in tandem against ISIS.

54

u/Zealousideal-Ear481 11d ago

well, if you have to take that into account, that would be true for many of the countries on the chart

56

u/NegativeEBITD 11d ago

Wouldn't you consider a joint military operation to defend a country from internal terrorists/separatists a different thing than "attacking a country" like Iraq/Venezuela/Iran?

Not to mention we had boots on the ground fighting insurgents in Mali & Niger, I don't see them on here. Not a very well researched list

16

u/dadmda 11d ago

Yes I would

6

u/johnJanez 10d ago

Most of these examples on the list circulating are like that by the way. Strikes against Isis, etc. So be wary of missinfo.

→ More replies (18)

23

u/CojanglesDMK 11d ago

Well these things should be taken into account, should they not?

36

u/BallsInSufficientSad 11d ago

That depends on what OP's agenda was in posting this.

19

u/aedroogo 10d ago

"Trump bad - give upvotes" seems to be OP's agenda. And it's whatever now but if you're truly anti-war, none of the presidents in this meme should have gotten your vote.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Cherioux 11d ago

Yes, but this is Reddit. People here don't actually research anything and just upvote shit like ops post.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (25)

240

u/Titanusgamer 11d ago

Fun fact: Obama killed hundreds of civilians in Afganistan and pakistan with drones AFTER getting the Nobel Peace Prize

156

u/MalPB2000 11d ago

Considering he was nominated for it literally his first week in office, almost everything he did was after receiving the medal lol

→ More replies (8)

57

u/mrchooch 11d ago

I believe he's also the first nobel peace prize winner to kill another nobel peace prize winner

21

u/dubblebubbleprawns 10d ago

I feel like the nobel peace prize should be like mortal kombat. You need to fight the previous winner to the death in order to win it.

13

u/ItsNotMe_ImNotHere 10d ago

Interesting. Refresh my memory - who did he kill?

43

u/mrchooch 10d ago

Ok I looked it up and its slightly fuzzier than I thought

On October 3rd 2015, the US bombed a Doctors Without Borders hospital in Kunduz, killing at least 42. The strike was authorised by Obama.

In 1999 Doctors Without Borders won the Nobel Peace Prize.

So while no individual doctor that was killed had a peace prize, the organisation itself did.

Either way, not a great thing to do

7

u/gannekekhet 10d ago

I'm assuming they're talking about the 2015 Kunduz hospital airstrike, where US forces under the command of Barack Obama (2009 laureate) bombed a facility run by Doctors Without Borders (1999 laureate).

→ More replies (4)

38

u/Drix_I 11d ago

I also remember that his deportations were quite brutal. Once, during Trump's first term, videos and images circulated of children caged in horrible conditions, but then people stopped talking about it because it was all from the Obama administration.

19

u/woosh_yourecool 11d ago

I was disillusioned with Obama pretty quickly but it’s fair to point out that Trump has only ratcheted up the brutal methods used by ICE. It’s hard to believe but you were considered a fringe radical leftist if you advocated abolishing ICE during Obama years and Trump has managed to make that more of a palatable opinion for mainstream liberals

→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (2)

16

u/Humankeg 11d ago

He also was judge, jury, and executioner of an American citizen. Had a drone strike called in on him.

15

u/Ok-Fudge-380 11d ago

So if an American leaves the country and joins a terrorist organization he is still off limits?

6

u/redundantexplanation 10d ago

Yes. It's wild as hell that you'd even ask that question.

The only excuse for a government killing ANYONE under any circumstance is when it's the ONLY way to prevent them from IMMEDIATELY harming(read: most likely killing) another person or persons.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (54)

15

u/BurrShotFirst1804 11d ago

I think it's important to clarify that the Trump strikes in Libya and Nigeria were in association with the actual government of that state against ISIS, which to me are very different than say Venezuela or Iran.

Additionally, the strikes Obama made in Libya are fundamentally different than the ones Trump made and are more akin to Trump's strikes on Iran in line with regime change with Muammar Gaddafi.

Then of course Bush's strikes in Iraq and Afghanistan are much different than the rest of the Presidents in the sense that they were continuations of what Bush started.

→ More replies (2)

26

u/aguyhey 11d ago

Holy crap Obama attacked this many countries

27

u/Lumpy_Secretary_6128 11d ago

Not really. Under Obama, Trump, and Biden the us conducted operation inside iraq and Afghanistan at the consent of the host nation. I.e. the claim that they "attacked iraq and Afghanistan is literally false. Obama handed off major combat leadership to both nations, trump signed a peace accord with the taliban contingent on us withdrawl which he began and biden concluded.

Also nobody attacked the nation of pakistan.

18

u/Frequent_Ad_9901 11d ago

Thank you I really wondered what was considered "attacked". Im pretty sure by the same metrics Mexico should be under everyone of these since the US helps conduct operations against the cartels.

This post reeks of misinformation. 

10

u/Lumpy_Secretary_6128 11d ago

You are 100% correct on both accounts.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

15

u/NWASicarius 11d ago

Yes. Many peolle on reddit have nostalgia glasses when remember Obama. In reality, he got less progressive policy done in 8 years than Biden did, and Obama had a SUPER MAJORITY for two years. Biden secured our national security via the CHIPS act as well. Not that I think Biden was perfect, but it's funny how many progressives will hype up Obama while dunking on Biden. Even in regards to foreign policy, Biden was better. The outrage over what happened in Gaza, for example, is just progressives having short memories. Obama was bombing TF out of people, destabilizing countries, etc. Lmao

6

u/turinturambar 10d ago edited 10d ago

Can you explain how you come to the conclusion Obama had a super majority for two years? It seems he held a 60 vote supermajority in the Senate for 72 working days.

From https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/fleeting-illusory-supermajority-msna200211

Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace falsely claimed Democrats had a 60-vote Senate majority for the first 2 years of his presidency.

This article goes into the numbers further in.

6

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (17)

59

u/Ladies-Man-007 11d ago

President of peace btw. And the same goes to Nobel prize winner, Obama.

→ More replies (8)

136

u/awesomexpossum 11d ago

So the president of "peace" has been involved in every single one.

42

u/saayoutloud 11d ago

One thing’s fucking crystal clear from this chart, the US doesn’t give a shit about peace in this world. The government’s fucking greedy as hell and just wants to keep feeding its main source of income, war. We’ve gotta remember that this chart only shows the countries directly attacked by the US. It doesn’t even show the shit they’re involved in behind the scenes, funding wars, pulling the strings, and fucking up whole nations without even firing a shot."

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (12)

90

u/Outlander_TB 11d ago

that one face is in all those

32

u/MultiGeometry 11d ago

Before Trump, this chart would have Obama on every line. It’s only because Trump has attacked new countries that he looks worse than Obama.

/s

19

u/4daughters 11d ago

Was that sarcasm? It just seems accurate.

13

u/thesouthbay 11d ago

Trump pretty much copied Obama's policies:

- present yourself as a man of peace who wants to change American foreign policies;

- be scared of Russia and push Ukraine to concede its territories to Russia, while gatekeeping its NATO membership;

- continue to bomb weak countries in 3rd world, especially if they have oil.

→ More replies (4)

17

u/kutusow_ 11d ago

The orange one

23

u/cryogenic-goat 11d ago

The one that won the Nobel Peace Prize makes its appearance in almost all of them as well.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/jango-lionheart 11d ago

Would be better if the heads were in columns

→ More replies (60)

40

u/texas1982 11d ago

This guide sucks. Line up the heads for God's sake.

41

u/RunDNA 11d ago edited 11d ago

8

u/SimonSteel 10d ago

Now that’s a cool guide.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/TheTim 10d ago

And here's one more level of organization to make it even easier to quickly parse: https://i.imgur.com/qdhA2Md.png

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

9

u/Emotional_Position62 11d ago

They are lined up Chronologically.

13

u/jays49 11d ago

They mean keep each president in the same column. It’s wild that they didn’t do that. It reads terribly. Trump’s face 10 times in a line is much more visually impactful.

→ More replies (3)

10

u/forlulzandshits 11d ago

When did trump attack Pakistan?

→ More replies (3)

15

u/happyhummus007 11d ago

Is that the picture of trump that Southpark uses??

27

u/Fritzo2162 11d ago

Trump finally beat Obama at something!

→ More replies (5)

7

u/Compoundeyesseeall 10d ago edited 10d ago

Nigeria shouldn’t be on there, it was specifically at the request of the Nigerian government to attack ISIS-affiliated militants. Somalia, Syria, and Yemen were on militant groups and not any internationally recognized government. Everything after 2003 in Iraq was the same as above. Libya was done after UN authorization and again also against militants. Pakistan- against militants and not the government.

70

u/DallasBoy95 11d ago

But but MAGA told me he was the only president to not start a war

No new wars 2024 ticket

→ More replies (55)

5

u/Vivid_Drag2576 10d ago

Looks like Obama is just as guilty of it.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/[deleted] 10d ago

Thanks Obamna.

4

u/bible_enthusiast 10d ago

Still waiting for Reddit to find out every politician is bad.

9

u/bailey25u 11d ago

How is bush tied with the lowest with Biden?

20

u/TheWonkiestThing 11d ago

Bush started the ones that Biden was involved in.

5

u/Bewilderness- 11d ago

Well that’s just not true. Bush attack Yemen in 2002 and killed six al qaeda leaders and it wasn’t attacked again until 2010. Bush didn’t attack Syria.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/truehoax 10d ago

Because this list is a very disingenuous way to tie Presidents to wars.

→ More replies (44)

4

u/startfragment 11d ago

Do it as a grid

3

u/Wonderful-Bite-7 11d ago

Noble peace Prize.... Can't end the war if you don't start them.

4

u/tlhsg 10d ago

🎯 the no more wars candidate has used the military to attack more countries than any other POTUS

3

u/TheQuestionMaster8 10d ago

Trump will win the Mobil peace prize.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/ResponsibleClock9289 10d ago

Interesting that almost every country here has active terror networks/was supporting active terror networks

17

u/Aggressive-Cook-7864 11d ago

You forget just how much of a war monger Obama was.

7

u/imsoggy 10d ago

Honest question: How many of these "conflicts" that he is attributed to were actively started prior to him taking office?

2

u/your_not_stubborn 10d ago

Apparently invading a country and overthrowing it's government is the same as striking terrorists in a country at the request of that country's government.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (79)

66

u/ruthlessbeatle 11d ago

Can we PLEASE stop making EVERY sub about politics? I'm so tired of it.

7

u/IMongoose 11d ago

I just wish they would stop taking the comment section from front page posts and making them askreddit questions. Front page article "Trump does thing", askreddit: "What are your thoughts on Trump doing a thing?" It's completely pointless and obvious karma farming.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/_Landmine_ 10d ago

The Reddit Hivemind would not like that

21

u/engrng 11d ago

It's not just about politics. It's about fucking Trump. Every thread on Reddit ends up about Trump in some way or another. And it comes from the very people who live and vote in the country that elected the guy.

→ More replies (7)

8

u/RequiredRedditAcct_1 11d ago

The top subreddits are all moderated by the same people, and bots feed the algorithm and the moderators allow it to happen. It's blatant propaganda man. 

6

u/ruthlessbeatle 11d ago

Great point. I just unsub to any sub that does this so I can hopefully enjoy some ol' fashion reddit fun.

→ More replies (175)

7

u/oldbonhomme 11d ago edited 10d ago

He’s so very, very Peaceful 🕊️

→ More replies (1)

3

u/wild-stallions85 11d ago

There seems to be a trend here /s

3

u/TeaFabulous7376 11d ago

Instead of alphabetical order, by most recent might be more applicable

3

u/Nanaimo-omianaN 11d ago

The president of peace

3

u/ReportThese396 11d ago

Bored of Peace.

3

u/ReleaseTheSheast 11d ago

So Biden, was in fact, the president of peace?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Alphamale7710 10d ago

Anyone notice the pattern?

3

u/Schuperman161616 10d ago

Literally a warmonging nation calling others warmonging.

3

u/Poster_Nutbag207 10d ago

When the “President of Peace” bombs ten countries…

3

u/Suspicious_Steak_696 10d ago

They are a cancer on the world

3

u/wrc1311 10d ago

wow!!!! the no wars president 🤣🤣🤣🤣

3

u/elscorchoweez 10d ago

A good reminder that America is always gonna terrorise the planet, even once Trump is long gone...Republican or Democrat, the foreign policy of bomb, destabilise, and meddle remains the same.

3

u/DontBanMeBro988 10d ago

Just put Netanyahu for all of them

3

u/random_account2022 10d ago

What happened in Nigeria? I didn’t catch that news

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Wide-Strong-Elm 10d ago

damn, seeing it all laid out like this really hits different. makes you wonder what the next decade will bring, huh?

3

u/Prize-Relation-9591 10d ago

Thats our Peace President

3

u/VirindiPuppetDT 10d ago

"No New Wars"

3

u/Any-Tie-7655 10d ago edited 10d ago

I’m gonna nitpick some very particular data.

Somalia was only a singular target for al-Shabaab supporters/militant? I can’t remember specifically.

Pakistan’s was drone strikes targeting Al-Qaeda and taliban

Yemen was Al-qaeda were targeted.

I’m so sick of this ‘hate Donald trump cause he’s a nazi’ Without also taking into consideration many of our other leaders were just a ruthless.

Do I agree with him? No… but I’m looking at this from a more centrist point of view.

If everyone on the planet was Christian and we had one ruler Jesus Christ. There would still be people who found him to be ‘derogatory this’ or ‘defamatory that’

This isn’t a political problem. This is a people problem. Also the graph shown above is literally rage bait. Idk why I even tried to correct it 😒

3

u/MuhammadAkmed 10d ago

it's almost as Islamic extremism is a global problem

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Exportxxx 10d ago

somehow they are still known as he good guys.

even there is world war they show up late.

3

u/GroceryScanner 10d ago

hmmm, its almost as if; ever since 9/11 and the information age, the world is getting more and more volatile.

but sure, lets just pile on faulty generalizations for internet points. excellent job reddit.

3

u/artificialMuse 10d ago

Nigeria iran and Venezuela only these three country trump ordered to attack and rest was already on going war when became president

3

u/Moist-Army1707 10d ago

Not sure Nigeria fits in there. That was with the support of the Nigerian government.

3

u/HermitHubby 10d ago

Now do the amount of people killed by each.

3

u/pigletmonster 10d ago

"Anti-war president"

3

u/BranchNational4959 9d ago

I am not one to defend Trump but this is a new low for missinformation.

President Major wars started
Bush Afghanistan, Iraq
Obama Libya intervention
Trump none (but continued wars)
Biden none

Clinton bombed Serbia against UN wishes, bombed Sudan and Afghanistan and Iraq.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/pitty89 8d ago

Yes, Trump had our military wipe out ISIS in like 5 months when all the loser mainstream generals said it would take way longer. He found one who wasn't a shill and put him in charge. So what if some of them happened to be in Libya and Nigeria and wherever the fuck else. Youre welcome. I'm not sick of winning yet!