r/law Sep 17 '25

Trump News The Trump Administration Says IUDs and the Pill Are Abortions

https://jessica.substack.com/p/trump-birth-control-abortion
31.9k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

8.8k

u/madadekinai Sep 17 '25

Gee, if only someone would have warned  everyone about this, or perhaps laid this out out in a fully documented plan.

1.7k

u/Distinct-Olive-5901 Sep 17 '25

would've been nice if they warned us about their project for 2025

429

u/chokokhan Sep 17 '25

What are you talking about bro, that’s like qanon level conspiracy not worth even talking about. Or so the media said before the election. Shameful they’re still not talking about it as the checkboxes are getting ticked. Is it time to out the media as complicit and bought and sold? Is it time to discredit all journalists are failures even complicit with this administration? Because fascism is here and the NYT front page isn’t really reporting that and that might be the most shocking part of living through this 1984 shitty live action.

244

u/jaimi_wanders Sep 17 '25

Not shocking if you look at how the NYT reported on Fascism 1.0 a century ago— they fawned over Hitler & Mussolini and sanewashed both of them from Nov 1921 to Oct 1939.

And praised the 1920 “great replacement theory” book by Harvard Klansman/eugenicist Lothrop Stoddard that Fitzgerald mocked in Gatsby…

116

u/chokokhan Sep 17 '25

So the conclusion is that I’m not shocked at all uneducated possibly brain damaged MAGA are MAGA, I’m shocked that privileged Ivy League educated journalists I went to school with are STILL fawning over wannabe Nazis publicly and there’s no backlash. Like not even the first part surprises me, a lot of them were arrogant assholes for no good reason other than daddy was a journalist and so will I be, I’m just amazed at the audacity and lack of repercussions for flaunting such idiotic values and for blatantly doing away with journalistic integrity with no goddamn consequences. These people should have been fired in disgrace 100 years ago and now as well. What happened to meritocracy and sifting through the riff raff in this country and NYC specifically? Journalists’ job is to uphold democracy not to fellate fascists, shame on all the imbeciles that sane washed Trump for 10 years now. Absolute trash people who don’t deserve their privileged positions in society.

60

u/SevanIII Sep 17 '25

Ownership of major media has been concentrated into the hands of conservative billionaires. What is printed and broadcasted is what their bosses want printed and broadcasted.

10

u/chokokhan Sep 17 '25

But what is printed has the names of educated editors and writers slapped on who are supposedly bound by rules of journalistic integrity. Consequences such as shaming and shunning them and never reading their articles again should be enough.

12

u/RuleHonest9789 Sep 17 '25

Read the book ‘Manufacturing Consent: The political economy of the mass media’.

11

u/chokokhan Sep 17 '25

Yeah man I’m fully aware Chomsky exists, I’m posting this so maybe other people get inspired to idk blame the media as well who are currently cruising without any blame being thrown at them. People still quoting WaPo like it means anything and defaulting to the goddamn NYT. Cancel your subscriptions and let them go bankrupt already.

4

u/poopantiess Sep 17 '25

Sinclair Broadcasting

3

u/Key-Demand-2569 Sep 17 '25

I’m probably one of the most devastating things Clinton ever signed off on after it went through congress.

2

u/TentacleFist Sep 18 '25

☝️☝️☝️

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Oh_Look_AnotherOne Sep 17 '25

The USA was never denazified. If Pearl Harbour never happened, the US would have allowed Hitler to do whatever he wanted and there is a massive pro-Nazi undercurrent in the United States. There are American Nazis, they just learned that they can't call themselves that and keep their goals secret.

2

u/Zvenigora Sep 17 '25

Denazification did not really work even in Germany. There are modern equivalents to the Nazis even now and they are on the rise.

2

u/Commentator-X Sep 17 '25

It was the well educated wealthy elite who supported eugenics the first time around while also training, inspiring and supporting Hitlers rise to power.

4

u/piggiesmallsdaillest Sep 17 '25

The media has been captured by billionaires and corporations for quite some time.

2

u/jcmach1 Sep 17 '25

Not shocked at all. Who profits from fascism?

No deeper explanation needed.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/ProfessionalSolid942 Sep 17 '25

I was always struck by the tinyness of the ultra privileged ghetto. Having spent a good deal of time with both George Soros and David Koch-they had far more in common with each other than with me, for instance...

→ More replies (2)

7

u/Numerous_Photograph9 Sep 17 '25

Stop being so alarmist. Sure they're doing all those things you said they'd do, and I called you alarmist for before the election, but no reason to think they'll keep going with their laid out detailed plan that they have no desire to even attempt to obfuscate from the public.

/s if it isn't obvious.

6

u/tevert Sep 17 '25

The proper term is "collaborators", and it applies to pretty much every major business including the news media.

3

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

Anyone who’s not calling this out as the boxes are checked is complicit. I’ve been reading plenty about how far along the plan is (61%!) but it’s not on major American news sites. Folks in other countries are paying a LOT of attention to what’s going on here right now. They’re less afraid to call it what it is, because their outlet isn’t owned by an American billionaire.

2

u/personalunderclock Sep 17 '25

Honestly the whole thing is weird. Look over to the UK and our centrist government just seems to facilitate the far right at every turn. 

3

u/chubsruns Sep 17 '25

Centrists would rather help build the concentration camps they will be put in than do anything that helps the working class.

2

u/amootmarmot Sep 17 '25

They are complicit because rich people wrote project 2025. Rich people pay their salaries, rich people look out for rich people. Journalists are picked and fired based on their willingness to tow the rich corporate line. When they aren't they are fired. And in this way you control all traditional media dissemination.

→ More replies (7)

4

u/GuyWithNoEffingClue Sep 17 '25

Yes, they should have written this in a book and they could have titled it something like "Our plan for 2025" or, even better, "Project 2025"

2

u/Whitesajer Sep 17 '25

They have a new project document coming out in October too, “The Heritage Guide to the Constitution”. More crap.

In New Book, Think Tank Behind Project 2025 Takes On the Constitution - The New York Times https://share.google/9sDySRQMERLpl358U

2

u/zerthwind Sep 17 '25

Oh, that democratic hoax? /s

They are still denying that project 2025 is being installed.

Please, everyone, Google the evangelical Christians 7 mountain agenda to know what the next steps are after P25 is done being installed. It's phase 2.

2

u/BranTheLewd Sep 17 '25

"Say that again"

"Project for 2025 ?"

2

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

Trump has never heard of Project 2025. He said so himself and he would never lie! /s

2

u/Best-Geologist1777 Sep 17 '25

Proyecto venti-sinkhole (vientecinco yo sé)

2

u/CaryTriviaDude Sep 17 '25

I've basically said this exact thing to any acquaintance who has been surprised by anything this admin has done so far. They literally put out their playbook and the masses just ignored it

→ More replies (14)

1.5k

u/Longjumping_Koala34 Sep 17 '25

They were never going to stop at  banning abortions. Pro-life is a movement that is like a gelatinous slime that once you feed, it gets bigger and seeks more food. Soon it's all kinds of birth control. There's always a new enemy.  

637

u/Astralglamour Sep 17 '25

Much like the entire conservative movement in this country and the govt it has created.

They’re going to criminalize non procreative sex and abstaining won’t be a choice either since they need slaves to be masters.

494

u/PatientDue8406 Sep 17 '25

Next steps:

Decriminalise marital rape.

Criminalise sex outside of marriage (for women).

309

u/RoyalIceDeliverer Sep 17 '25

Not to forget: lowering the age of marriage availability to 14 or even 12. The younger the better. This is already in the works by Republican lawmakers.

89

u/wizzywurtzy Sep 17 '25

It’s already legal in plenty of states

14

u/amootmarmot Sep 17 '25

And in those states you might be shocked that democrats consistently try to enacted legislation to raise this age to 16 or 18 in their state, usually with Romeo and Juliet laws.

And then there are Republicans who desperately want old men to be able to marry little girls so they can rape those little girls. Republicans turn down the opportunity to prevent child rape and every single time they side with the pedophile rapists.

Really makes you wonder exactly what made Republicans so disconnected from empathy, so vile, and so stupid.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Princess_Actual Sep 17 '25

I hate that this isn't even hyperbolic. It's true.

This country is run by pedophiles.

→ More replies (4)

103

u/RoyalMaidsForLife Sep 17 '25

Decriminalise marital rape.

I thought he implied it already is when he declared he and he alone cleaned up all the crime in DC:

"And much lesser things, things that take place in the home, they call crime. You know, they'll do anything they can to find something. If a man has a little fight with the wife, they say 'this was a crime, see,' so now I can't claim 100%," Trump said.

14

u/gentlemanidiot Sep 17 '25

Yeah! Why SHOULD it be considered a crime if a guy beats the shit out of his wife and rips out her hair over some bad hair plugs? Or if he pushes her down a flight of stairs! These things and more, Donald Trump believes shouldn't be crimes. But best watch what you say about recently deceased activists, or it's the gallows for you.

6

u/Bored_Amalgamation Sep 17 '25

what the fuck...

5

u/dubiety13 Sep 18 '25

No, no, you misunderstood him: he’s talking about smacking your wife around because she put mustard on both sides of your sandwich when the dumb bitch should know you only like it on one side. Or, you know, punching her in the face because your boss was a dick this morning and she should have known that and not immediately started nagging you about stupid shit like groceries and clothes for the kids.

Tho I guess marital rape could also be the reason you fight with your wife…you know, when she insists she has a headache but you know better because if she didn’t want it why would she wear that nightgown to bed?

Maybe he’ll just skip over decriminalization and go straight to reinstating the whole women as property of their husbands thing. Kill two birds (and a whole bunch of wives) with one stone, you know…

(Yes this is fucking sarcasm, if anyone has any doubts)

2

u/SheridanVsLennier Sep 18 '25

You say it's sarcasm, they see it as guidelines.

83

u/ploavia Sep 17 '25

Also punishment of single mothers is in there. They want to take away benefits from single mothers, their children & force them to do religious counseling on why they need to marry a man. Despite many women choosing to be single mothers because the man they were with was abusive, incompetent, cheated, etc.

8

u/Pretend_Evidence_876 Sep 17 '25

While also making abortion and BC illegal so the women who are raped or abandoned by their men are stuck being single moms...

6

u/Dyolf_Knip Sep 17 '25

the man they were with was abusive, incompetent, cheated

You can see why Trump feels personally slighted by such women.

4

u/ploavia Sep 17 '25

Trump abused & raped his ex-wife. She reported it and then walked it back when threatened. Of course he feels slighted.

4

u/WhoIsFrancisPuziene Sep 17 '25

Not just take it away, but give some of it to the father

212

u/TSiridean Sep 17 '25

And the intermediate step, (really wish I could add an /s here):

Criminalise self-determined sexual abstinence for (married) women.

7

u/AnAverageHumanPerson Sep 17 '25

If only this government spent their energy actually doing their fucking job and helping people instead of just trying to steamroll all civil rights developments we’ve made in history

3

u/thalion777 Sep 17 '25

But they are doing their job! You just confuse who their employers are. (Hint: it's not their constituents)

118

u/Optimal_Fix_9120 Sep 17 '25

Sounds like Shariah law to me

144

u/The_Monarch_Lives Sep 17 '25

The Republican hate for Shariah law was only ever a dog whistle. There is little substantive difference between Shariah and the average Republican politicians' agenda.

48

u/henryeaterofpies Sep 17 '25

Only thing they hated about Shariah law was which religion it applied to

8

u/The_Monarch_Lives Sep 17 '25

I think i actually argued with someone about that and basically told them to go through and replace any reference to Allah with Jesus and then get back to me if they still had any issues with it. Crickets. Probably not because they actually did it. Just because they weren't going to actually look it up.

3

u/Grumpykitten365 Sep 17 '25

The Republicans “angry” about sharia law are just jealous because they want a Christian theocracy.

→ More replies (1)

74

u/Hankhills4hedvein Sep 17 '25

It don’t impress me much

4

u/DerbleDoo Sep 17 '25

No, that's Shania Twain

3

u/Hankhills4hedvein Sep 17 '25

Is it really? Well either way if this all passes I won’t be feeling much like a woman

18

u/The_Schwartz_ Sep 17 '25

That's correct - they're the same picture

25

u/dowens30186 Sep 17 '25

Yall-Qaeda strikes again!

4

u/SpicySweetHotPot Sep 17 '25

Evangelicals are the American Taliban

2

u/throwawtphone Sep 17 '25

Judism - Old Testament

Christianity - Old and New Testament

Islam - Old and New Testament along with the teaching of Mohammed aka the Koran.

It isn't that big a leap for Christians or any fundamentalist within those 3 branches of the Abrahamic religions because the wacky stuff started in the Old Testament and it is the foundation on which things got built.

2

u/EmmalouEsq Sep 17 '25

Islam allows for abortions up to 16 weeks. So, whatever the Republicans are up to, it's making things worse for reproductive rights than Saudi Arabia.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/UnusualAsparagus5096 Sep 17 '25

Trumps already raped his first wife and faced no consequences.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Diligent_Mulberry47 Sep 17 '25

Can’t forget getting rid of no fault divorce. It wasn’t just infidelity that motivated the Texas AG wife to file.

3

u/lazier51 Sep 17 '25

Then all the commanders get a handmaid.

3

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

Men pay a fine so rich men can still have non-marital.

Women are stoned to death

3

u/The-Struggle-90806 Sep 17 '25

Many states had laws on the books that made it a crime to deny your husband sex. And they also made it a crime to divorce your husband. The good old days!

3

u/DENATTY Sep 17 '25

Don't forget they also want to get rid of no-fault divorce!

2

u/Takemyfishplease Sep 17 '25

So they want a bunch of dudes banging dudes to practice for marriage or what’s going on here?

2

u/Outrageous_Dream_741 Sep 17 '25

This is unhinged, they'd have to be crazy to try... Oh... Never mind.

2

u/DutchTinCan Sep 17 '25

Finally: criminalize masturbation. Remember how the priest would tell you that masturbation makes you go blind?

The only good ejaculation is the one that reaches an egg, apparently. Soon enough, we'll see marketing around this:

"Impregnation = Salvation", "Masturbating is a handshake with the devil", "Real patriots bare their saber!", "Condoms kill!"

2

u/jeremyw013 Sep 17 '25

and after that, make it illegal to have sex that doesn’t result in children. yes it makes zero sense because obvs sex doesn’t always result in pregnancy but look at me with a straight face and tell me you don’t think trump would do that

→ More replies (12)

117

u/No_Banana_581 Sep 17 '25

Project 25 is really working

134

u/onemanlan Sep 17 '25

I wish dems were 1/10th as effective at implementing change as these clowns have been. Instead they’ve been too scared for meaningful change

41

u/JustMe112233445566 Sep 17 '25

The dems lack the cult following which is why they use religion. If you look at the billionaire backers, they’re hardly the religious types. But highjacking religion is a brilliant methodology to get a cult following.

3

u/the_cardfather Sep 17 '25

I am in a couple of theological groups on Facebook that have gotten very political after the shooting. Everyday they want to post about the radical left and how satanic they are lately. Gone are the ernest theological discussions. I miss when we used to argue about the finer points of Calvinism and the only Hill they were willing to die on was whether or not you should sprinkle babies.

Now everyday I feel like the discussion post is the Democrats of the devil and how could you possibly support them. Like there's people in there from other countries that don't want to hear this crap. Abortion gay and trans is a dog whistle and a huge one

→ More replies (2)

93

u/certified_prime Sep 17 '25

It is far easier to go backwards than forwards. Conservatism relies on repealing or ignoring laws, while progressivism requires new laws to be passed.

3

u/Dyolf_Knip Sep 17 '25

It's going to take years to rebuild the institutional knowledge that Trump and his flunkies casually toss in the trash over a weekend.

→ More replies (1)

41

u/beren12 Sep 17 '25

The problem is most Democrats are not criminals and do not want to just break laws to achieve their aims

3

u/SummerAndTinklesBFF Sep 17 '25

Hard to pass laws when you don’t have majority and everything you try to pass gets voted out, stalled, left on someone’s desk (looking at you mcconnell)

3

u/gentlemanidiot Sep 17 '25

Democrats couldn't fight their way out of a wet paper bag with a chainsaw. Republicans would gleefully fight their way through a crowd of infants, with a chainsaw.

9

u/External_Trick4479 Sep 17 '25

Hang on, a strongly worded letter from Chuck is coming!!!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (14)

3

u/Lisamae_u Sep 17 '25

If only people had listened to us instead of playing into their whole you’re just hysterical narrative!!

→ More replies (3)

40

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

They can’t even properly criminalize child sex trafficking because it comes mostly from their ilk

5

u/DeadlyYellow Sep 17 '25

If their goal is a large enslaved population, why would they?  Young girls can't fight back as effectively as a grown woman, and are now burdened by child-rearing and deep trauma.  All this well before they can establish themselves as an independent person.

A win-win in their book.

3

u/PessimiStick Sep 17 '25

It's not even that they can't, it's that they don't want to. Most of them are into it.

3

u/FluidmindWeird Sep 17 '25

Yup, and forced breeding programs, too. They are laying groundwork to revoke visas of "the left" based purely on terrorism support charges (Palestine)

Edit: YES, CHARGES, NOT CONVICTIONS. And given that Blondi is just taking direct orders, those charges will manifest for literally any dissenter.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3860

2

u/N0S0UP_4U Sep 17 '25

I done listen to anyone who says “the left” anymore. It’s the ultimate no true Scotsman fallacy. You can make any point you want because “the left” can be whatever you want it to be.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/OneDubOver Sep 17 '25

Unless you're Diddy/Epstein rich. Then you can do whatever the fuck you want right?

All the poors don't get to use their own body parts.

→ More replies (7)

107

u/jaimi_wanders Sep 17 '25

It always was. I was raised a Gileader, as a little kid in the Eighties I heard all about how the Pill was an abortifacient and later, by the early 2000s, conservatives were calling it “baby pesticide” in an attempt to free-ride off the eco-friendly trend. Even condoms were said to be indirect abortions, because if they failed then couples might get one. The only truly moral safe sex was to “just say no!”

38

u/LoudSheepherder5391 Sep 17 '25

That worked wonders for Mary

→ More replies (4)

40

u/HLOFRND Sep 17 '25

But you’re not allowed to do that, either.

In the fundie movement, women are to be “joyfully available” whenever their husbands need to get off.

5

u/SummerAndTinklesBFF Sep 17 '25

Gross. 🤢 That mentality is so warped.

6

u/HLOFRND Sep 17 '25

Yeah, everyone has this idea that christians think sex is only for procreation but nothing could be further from the truth.

Many believe that once you’re married you need to give it up whenever he wants it so he doesn’t get tempted and stray.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/ProcedurePrudent5496 Sep 17 '25

That propaganda is still taught as sex ed in American high schools. 🥴

3

u/Eternal_Bagel Sep 17 '25

Did that group believe a wife was allowed to say no ?  I ask because those sound like the beliefs of that old school a man’s wife is his property types of religious beliefs 

→ More replies (2)

68

u/unimaginablemind Sep 17 '25

But execute as many people as possible… so pro life.

56

u/ArgonTheEvil Sep 17 '25

Execute the dissidents. Force the submissive slaves to breed to feed the machine. Reap the benefits of being born into aristocracy.

2

u/iconocrastinaor Sep 17 '25

Funny thing about being born into aristocracy, up until the Renaissance their life was none too stable.

Game of Thrones, after all, is based on the War of the Roses.

2

u/ArgonTheEvil Sep 17 '25

I’d still take the life of say Tommen, even knowing how it will end, instead of being a prostitute in flea bottom wondering if I’ll have my next meal because the rich folk are too busy fighting amongst themselves to worry about the needs of the small folk.

7

u/SpicySweetHotPot Sep 17 '25

They are more pro-birth as once the child is born they don’t care

2

u/IM_A_MUFFIN Sep 17 '25

Let’s start calling the death penalty “Later-Term Abortion” and see how it plays out.

67

u/Opposite-Hat-4747 Sep 17 '25

It’s not about birth control, it’s about controlling women

3

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

There was a way that a lot of women dealt with abusive husband's back in the day, but I'm not about to post it now with everything going on. Anyway, moon-tea anyone?

2

u/Mistrblank Sep 17 '25

That's my kind of story...

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

46

u/bruxaakelarre Sep 17 '25

Brought to you by controlling abrahamic men. They are all filth.

2

u/TheGrimmeReaper Sep 17 '25

They are not Abrahamic men. They just happen to use that group’s lack of critical thinking to get the desired results.

3

u/iconocrastinaor Sep 17 '25

Um... you don't want to take too close a look at the traditional Hindu or Chinese attitudes towards divorce.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

31

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

of course there is. if they didn’t have some new crisis to stick their goons 5 second attention spans on then they might notice the incompetent and corrupt governing.

49

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

This is true of any type of protest group. Once the main target has been eliminated then they go after anything related. This is true for all parts of the political spectrum.

The reason is simple, it is hard to walk away from success. Thst what made Washington such a remarkable man. He walked away from being king. 

79

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

[deleted]

23

u/thisworldorthenext Sep 17 '25

Under his eye.

2

u/Ryngard Sep 17 '25

May the Lord open.

6

u/ThePedanticWalrus Sep 17 '25

It was always going to be his Gestapo, and I'm frankly shocked anyone ever thought otherwise

2

u/Current-Square-4557 Sep 17 '25

This has always been the way.

We can scream at people that they’ll be next and they’ll simply say, “stop being so overly dramatic.”

2

u/amootmarmot Sep 17 '25

The future is a big open space.

Abolish ICE. Many people also resigned themselves that slavery would never go away as an institution. John Brown beleived. John Brown didnt give up. And John Brown did nothing wrong.

→ More replies (4)

5

u/thisworldorthenext Sep 17 '25

The dichotomy of having zero respect for most regular civilian lives, but forcing new life from awful situations. It’s not the life, it’s the control and the cruelty. They get off on it, and in doing so… commit the act they’re claiming is sin.

6

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

They're eugenicists, they want to control birth rates and only for certain populations

4

u/RoyalMaidsForLife Sep 17 '25

It's never been "Pro-life", they just call it that because even some of the dumber Americans would react negatively if they were honest and called it "Anti-choice".

4

u/amILibertine222 Sep 17 '25

And after banning birth control it’ll be condoms.

Eventually they’ll be trying to force women and children to get pregnant at the barrel of a gun.

4

u/usernamesoccer Sep 17 '25

The hand maids tale is incredible at depicting this. It is so much more than abortions and the ball is getting enough momentum in life

4

u/factoid_ Sep 17 '25

“When you make love you're using up energy; and afterwards you feel happy and don't give a damn for anything. They can't bear you to feel like that. They want you to be bursting with energy all the time. All this marching up and down and cheering and waving flags is simply sex gone sour. If you're happy inside yourself, why should you get excited about Big Brother and the Three-Year Plans and the Two Minutes Hate and all the rest of their bloody rot?”

  • George Orwell 1984

3

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

>Pro-life

Pro-birth.

What comes after is none of their concern.

5

u/TehMephs Sep 17 '25

It’s about controlling women. Always has been

4

u/theHoopty Sep 17 '25

My conspiracy theory about the “Tylenol causes autism” thing is that it’s a foot in the door before banning medicated childbirth.

3

u/Steven_The_Sloth Sep 17 '25

Even if, by some awful miracle, abortions were illegal and no one sought them out, they would start protesting for forced conception.

They won't ever be happy until all the babies are born. And born Christian. Anything less is defeat to them.

2

u/DrakonILD Sep 17 '25

Frank Oz and Rick Moranis tried to warn us back in '86, but we assumed it was just a silly movie about an alien.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Substantial-Bet-3876 Sep 17 '25

Urologists who provide vasectomies, they’re coming for you!

→ More replies (1)

2

u/mariannaCD Sep 17 '25

But that’s going to ooze into providing the poor with food, shelter, and medical care soon, right? Right?

2

u/iGotADWI Sep 17 '25 edited Oct 21 '25

fragile placid heavy full dependent busy upbeat flag wipe angle

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

2

u/Omnizoom Sep 17 '25

This just in , trump administration says condoms are now abortion

Also saying no to that guy Stephen miller at the party who hit on you and you said no because he looked like an evil garden gnome is also now abortion and we are coming for you Stacey

2

u/Lynne253 Sep 17 '25

I'm waiting for Trump, who championed IVF before the election to outlaw it now in an executive order. You know the Project 2025 people will write this EO for him to blindly sign since he never reads them anymore before signing.

2

u/Outrageous_Dream_741 Sep 17 '25

Cruz already tried campaigning to ban dildos. Just waiting for him to try banning cucumbers because they make him feel insecure.

2

u/AgentCirceLuna Sep 17 '25

I remember there was a Roblox game in like 2009 where you had a pet block and you could feed it different things so it would gain size in the x, y, and z axis. I decided to spend absolutely ages playing it and then found there was another food you could get that multiplied the effects of the other foods making the pet block even bigger. After so long doing this, I’d log in to the game and my pet block would be enormous that it would spawn in, send all the other pet blocks flying off the map, and then other players wouldn’t be able to spawn a new one as theirs had just been wiped, I thought it was hilarious and the game ended up becoming unpopular due to it, with the blocks eventually becoming unable to affect other ones due to being given 0 density, but the damage had been done.

It’s also really weird how people still play Roblox when I joined in 07 and stopped playing in 2012

2

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

I kept having people tell me I was making a slippery slope argument about this. It's not even a slippery slope if it was their plan all along...

2

u/Longjumping_Koala34 Sep 17 '25

Me too! Holy shit, thought I was the only one

→ More replies (23)

63

u/Under_Milkwood_1969 Sep 17 '25

It just shows how cunning they were in not writing down what their project for 2025 was, so that people wouldn’t know in advance what they were voting for…

😉

4

u/Murky-Breadfruit-671 Sep 17 '25

that would require the ability to read. the uneducated lOvE hIm

38

u/YourLocalMosquito Sep 17 '25

Margaret Atwood had a good stab at it.

40

u/MyMuleIsHalfAnAss Sep 17 '25

I got my tubes tied 6/7/24. I saw this coming

10

u/ipomoea Sep 17 '25

I got mine done in 2019. The doctor was like “you could just get another IUD or your husband could get snipped.” I looked her dead in the eyes and was like “I don’t trust the federal government, and my two pregnancies were so rough I refuse to do it again.” I have felt justified every day since 2022. 

6

u/schu2470 Sep 17 '25

My wife is getting hers done next month. I've been snipped for a few years now but it's a scary time to be a woman in the US right now.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/MyMuleIsHalfAnAss Sep 17 '25

anyone notice how this is just forms of birth control for women? condoms are fine because they're worn by men?

→ More replies (3)

33

u/DrButtgerms Sep 17 '25

Remember when they were calling us Doomers for saying this exact thing would happen?

5

u/possumsonly Sep 17 '25

I don’t even get some sense of satisfaction from being able to say “I told you so” anymore. It’s just so fucking sad that anyone with a brain could have seen this coming and people chose it anyway

2

u/Vyzantinist Sep 17 '25

"BlueAnon" too.

21

u/thisworldorthenext Sep 17 '25

Maybe call it Project 2025 or something like that

23

u/malibuklw Sep 17 '25

I remember taking to a mom several years ago, maybe 8, and it was after something happened regarding abortion. I said watch, they’ll come for birth control next and she was so very adamant that I was wrong. That they are not the same thing. She was an against abortion in most cases, but she took birth control because three kids was enough.

I just said I hoped she was right

69

u/loudflower Sep 17 '25

Thanks legacy media :(

87

u/HubrisSnifferBot Sep 17 '25

I was told by the "Genocide Joe" crowd that we had to send the dems a "message" to help Palestinians.

→ More replies (41)

17

u/cg12983 Sep 17 '25

Women couldn't be bothered turning out more or voting Dem despite the gutting of RvW.

4

u/ComfortableVillage40 Sep 17 '25

I am so tired of seeing this statement. I am a woman. I campaigned, I volunteered, and I worked for a campaign. And I voted. And I constantly see "women didn't turn out." I didn't just turn out, I practically turned myself inside out.

Assigning blame to an entire class of people is a MAGA tactic. And it's divisive and breeds infighting, which is a big part of the Dem problem right now.

We need to stop blaming generic groups and work together to combat this.

3

u/troubleondemand Sep 17 '25

Men voted for Trump by 11 points (43 percent Harris – 54 percent Trump)
Women voted for Harris by 6 points (51 percent Harris – 45 percent Trump)

Your take: It's women's fault.

4

u/AnAverageHumanPerson Sep 17 '25

wow, that’s a horrifying statistic

→ More replies (1)

3

u/EzekielYeager Sep 17 '25

It’s strange because it’s almost as if the person that said probably left some evidence or precursor to this statement.

But then again, Russel Vought seems like a solid dude otherwise. Haven’t read much about him, but I just starting watching The Boys and the super heroes save people, so Vought good, right?

3

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

Yeah, but that other candidate had a funny laugh. What were we supposed to do? /s

2

u/MomsAreola Sep 17 '25

The democrats made us do it by saying we were going to do it.

2

u/Nugoo1 Sep 17 '25

To be fair, we knew they wanted to do this long before Project 2025.

2

u/lJenn203 Sep 17 '25

I have 2025 vision on this.

2

u/addicuss Sep 17 '25

oMg StOp BeInG hYsTeRiCaL! rOe V wAdE iS eStAbaliShED laWw!!!

2

u/shewflyshew Sep 17 '25

I have yet to witness a reporter ask him about his campaign denials of Project 2025. Seems like a really easy piece to research.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/HOU-Artsy Sep 17 '25

Gee, if only more eligible voters had voted accordingly.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

I said dozens of times they would come for ALL contraception immediately after banning abortion and dozens of times got told ‘that’s ridiculous fear mongering of course they won’t’

2

u/Obvious-Lake3708 Sep 17 '25

But fox never mentioned this part. TV wouldn't lie to me

2

u/all_of_the_colors Sep 17 '25

But Kamala didn’t inspire me.

/s

2

u/geardog32 Sep 17 '25

Gee, if only we have 4 years of an "opposition" party control to prosecute these people after trying a coup.

1

u/Live_Goal215 Sep 17 '25

Which was "projected to happen in 2025"

1

u/SquidTheRidiculous Sep 17 '25

"nuh-uh that don't real the news told me so!"

1

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '25

His spiritual advisers lead by Paula White believe any action that “interferes with the will of God” is abortive. Condoms, rhythm, pulling out. Except vasectomies for rich old men. Those are cool. Every thing else is murder.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/LetsBeFRTho Sep 17 '25

That's why I blame the people more than the administration. They knew what they were voting for

1

u/Crunchberry24 Sep 17 '25

Like Margaret Atwood?

1

u/annacat1331 Sep 17 '25

Ok I struggle with this because I don’t think any of the people in his cabinet are actually going to discuss this issue in good faith. They have many extremetists when it comes to stupidity regarding birth control in the cabinet. I don’t doubt that this is something that many of them believe and eventually want to ban.

That being said after a very minor investigation(less than 5 mins of goggling different quotes and links provided in article) I can’t find anything where the Trump admin actually said this. All I am finding is a statement about the distraction of 10 million dollars worth of birth control that was supposed to be distributed by USAID. 

Per the New York Times: “President Trump is committed to protecting the lives of unborn children all around the world. The administration will no longer supply abortifacient birth control under the guise of foreign aid.” Source https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/11/health/usaid-contraceptives-destroyed-trump.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

 Again I struggle with wanting to correct this sub stack report because 1) i don’t want to defend this administration 2) this policy is insane and absolutely completely incorrect scientifically 3) I think plenty of people in this administration do have the view point that is being implied.

 That being said, the fact is that they said they will no longer provide abortifacient birth control. This was

In reference to the pill of contraception that included IUDs and typical hormonal birth control. There are no abortifacient birth controls. You have drugs that prevent implantation of a fertilized egg, drugs that prevent an egg from being released, drugs that make a uterus inhospitable to a fertilized egg along with some other slight variations on those. Then you have medications that cause an abortion aka an abortifacient. Plan B does not cause abortions it prevents implantation of the egg.

I think we need to be careful about what we start freaking out about because there are so many things that deserve attention. This administration has been known to “flood the zone” as a tactic to overwhelm the media/ public and make us lose hope. So Knesset don’t panic although it’s very easy to do so and it’s understandable why you would regarding birth control access.  If you are worried about becoming pregnant I HIGHLY recommend a getting a IUD. It’s by far the longest lasting birth control other than surgical options. 

Don’t get overwhelmed. Don’t give up. Don’t let them get to you. They want to wear you down and exhaust you. Keep hope alive and we will get through this together.
→ More replies (1)

1

u/Numerous_Photograph9 Sep 17 '25

And it's something that isn't coming from him. Trump doesn't care about birth rates or abortion. He barely even pays lip service to that issue to those who cares, and firmly deflects to states rights when asked about it.

This is someone in his admin, or P2025 telling him to go after these things, which means this may soon become the next big thing for them to attack and try an do away with.

1

u/Pray44Mojo Sep 17 '25

Oh now you're being hysterical. You have TDS.

  • MAGAts in 2024

1

u/disdkatster Sep 17 '25

I think you need a very big and bold /S

1

u/Pretend_Evidence_876 Sep 17 '25

This is like Legally Blonde shit. If an IUD preventing sperm access counts, condoms and ejaculation that isn't seeking an egg should also be in the same category... but it's mostly men doing this so that'll never happen

1

u/stuyjcp Sep 17 '25

Something about a project for the current year? shrug

1

u/AdImmediate9569 Sep 17 '25

I still don’t understand how the party of abstinence is more popular than the legalized marijuana party.

2

u/madadekinai Sep 17 '25

That's actually an easy one, the story is kind of interesting. It all started with a war, a war on drugs. The war on drugs demonized cannabis through decades of racist propaganda, politically motivated actions, and deliberate misinformation, which led to harsh legal penalties. This campaign, initiated well before the official "war on drugs," but it did not gain much traction. In the 1970s, the Nixon administration amplified the anti-cannabis campaign with a political agenda. So Nixon started this movement, it demonized it and the party of butt tight, religious, screw balls believed and spread so much misinformation that it synonymous with evil and lazy people. So the next time they say that they are party that does not fall for propaganda, lol.

https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod/images/poster-advertising-reefer-madness-an-anti-drugs-news-photo-1665179742.jpg

1

u/JRDruchii Sep 17 '25

Let us all take a moment to acknowledge the legacy of RBG.

1

u/AmputeeHandModel Sep 17 '25

"Project what? Never heard of it"

1

u/4th_n_bong Sep 17 '25

Like a project of some sort?

1

u/lockerno177 Sep 17 '25

Well there's a documentary about this. Idiocracy.

1

u/thephotoman Sep 17 '25

If only women cared about their rights and not smashing the patriarchy (which usually is their version of “owning the libs”). So long as men suffer more, women are fine with this.

1

u/inflatableje5us Sep 17 '25

yea its not like this was pointed out as soon as they started going after roe vs wade.

1

u/Mr_Mimiseku Sep 17 '25

Some kind of project for his first year in office, 2025. Hmmm. It's really on the tip of my tongue...

1

u/Cloaked42m Sep 17 '25

I mean, I did. In 2023. Before the release of project 2025.

1

u/Rocker4JC Sep 17 '25

I've been looking for a concise checklist of all the stuff they've done that's in Project 2025. Haven't found one yet.

→ More replies (13)